Tools & Wizards About Us
cecr.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

cecr.in

India's Top Construction, Infrastructure & Civil Engineering Magazine

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

174 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

439 ms

cecr.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to cecr.in homepage info - get ready to check Cecr best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about cecr.in

India's Top Construction, Infrastructure & Civil Engineering Magazine. Unmatched coverage on Construction Industry & Infrastructure projects. Largest circulated journal providing latest news related c...

Visit cecr.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Cecr.in page load time and found that the first response time was 174 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cecr.in performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value28.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value8,100 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.1 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.cecr.in

174 ms

css2

67 ms

legacy.js

61 ms

modern.js

62 ms

extract-css-runtime-3eaeab0e9f7425695fb9-min.en-US.js

63 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Cecr.in, 61% (45 requests) were made to Images.squarespace-cdn.com and 15% (11 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Images.squarespace-cdn.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 529.5 kB (6%)

Content Size

8.3 MB

After Optimization

7.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cecr.in main page is 8.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 336.5 kB

  • Original 375.1 kB
  • After minification 318.8 kB
  • After compression 38.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 56.4 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 336.5 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 185.2 kB

  • Original 6.9 MB
  • After minification 6.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cecr images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 4.7 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 1.0 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 18.7 kB
  • After minification 18.7 kB
  • After compression 15.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cecr.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.1 kB or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (30%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

51

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cecr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.cecr.in

www.cecr.in

174 ms

css2

css2

67 ms

legacy.js

legacy.js

61 ms

modern.js

modern.js

62 ms

extract-css-runtime-3eaeab0e9f7425695fb9-min.en-US.js

extract-css-runtime-3eaeab0e9f7425695fb9-min.en-US.js

63 ms

extract-css-moment-js-vendor-379ed1f073b5f6832d4f-min.en-US.js

extract-css-moment-js-vendor-379ed1f073b5f6832d4f-min.en-US.js

193 ms

cldr-resource-pack-219949f05eae3cb7495a-min.en-US.js

cldr-resource-pack-219949f05eae3cb7495a-min.en-US.js

172 ms

common-vendors-stable-4bb1a6cceec2067d881f-min.en-US.js

common-vendors-stable-4bb1a6cceec2067d881f-min.en-US.js

178 ms

common-vendors-5bc6e08f4a1f84e136c5-min.en-US.js

common-vendors-5bc6e08f4a1f84e136c5-min.en-US.js

234 ms

common-895f2f5ba950f6fe0ee5-min.en-US.js

common-895f2f5ba950f6fe0ee5-min.en-US.js

315 ms

performance-6af4ff36772d274ff113-min.en-US.js

performance-6af4ff36772d274ff113-min.en-US.js

307 ms

site.css

site.css

62 ms

static.css

static.css

54 ms

site-bundle.41eaa1fb6d43514105e3007066fe136d.js

site-bundle.41eaa1fb6d43514105e3007066fe136d.js

23 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

308 ms

CE%26CR+Logo.jpg

CE%26CR+Logo.jpg

295 ms

page.php

page.php

284 ms

32.png

32.png

398 ms

33.png

33.png

397 ms

Layher+Banner+large+size.png

Layher+Banner+large+size.png

438 ms

Wirtgen+Banner+large+size+%281%29.png

Wirtgen+Banner+large+size+%281%29.png

443 ms

Issue+Highlight+%281%29.png

Issue+Highlight+%281%29.png

398 ms

Vollert+Box+Banner+new.png

Vollert+Box+Banner+new.png

436 ms

Trimble+Banner+%281%29.jpg

Trimble+Banner+%281%29.jpg

517 ms

bay-bridge-1.jpg

bay-bridge-1.jpg

551 ms

Feature+Image%2C+Bimal+Patwari%2C+Trimble.jpg

Feature+Image%2C+Bimal+Patwari%2C+Trimble.jpg

596 ms

Feature+Image%2C+Harsh+Preek%2C+Trimble.jpg

Feature+Image%2C+Harsh+Preek%2C+Trimble.jpg

640 ms

Feature+Image%2C+Lt+Gen+Rajeev+Chaudhry+VSM.jpg

Feature+Image%2C+Lt+Gen+Rajeev+Chaudhry+VSM.jpg

619 ms

Feature+Pidilite+Nilesh+Mazumdar%2C+Interview.jpg

Feature+Pidilite+Nilesh+Mazumdar%2C+Interview.jpg

719 ms

1+Highways3.jpeg

1+Highways3.jpeg

730 ms

3+Highways1.jpg

3+Highways1.jpg

554 ms

8+EnR+1.jpeg

8+EnR+1.jpeg

754 ms

istockphoto-649356164-612x612.jpg

istockphoto-649356164-612x612.jpg

827 ms

2+Highways2.jpg

2+Highways2.jpg

790 ms

Drones+In+Indian+Construction+Industry.jpg

Drones+In+Indian+Construction+Industry.jpg

851 ms

ACE+Banner+large+size.png

ACE+Banner+large+size.png

971 ms

ECMAS+Banner+large+size+%282%29.png

ECMAS+Banner+large+size+%282%29.png

913 ms

Ammann+Banner.jpg

Ammann+Banner.jpg

757 ms

MT+3000-2+Power+feeder.jpg

MT+3000-2+Power+feeder.jpg

760 ms

Image+1.jpg

Image+1.jpg

764 ms

Wokrshop+on+Wheel.JPG

Wokrshop+on+Wheel.JPG

916 ms

13.jpg

13.jpg

963 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

832 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

1051 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

1041 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

1085 ms

International+News+CE%26CR.jpg

International+News+CE%26CR.jpg

1124 ms

Feature+Image+2.jpg

Feature+Image+2.jpg

1205 ms

Feature+Image+3.jpg

Feature+Image+3.jpg

1161 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

1262 ms

Cecr+plus+April+Edition.png

Cecr+plus+April+Edition.png

1232 ms

Asian+Lab+banner+new+size+for+bottom.png

Asian+Lab+banner+new+size+for+bottom.png

1285 ms

Rotho+new+size+for+bottom.png

Rotho+new+size+for+bottom.png

1034 ms

P9nsECuATZh.css

P9nsECuATZh.css

24 ms

ydTcewBxpdU.js

ydTcewBxpdU.js

37 ms

o1ndYS2og_B.js

o1ndYS2og_B.js

64 ms

CxrAiykYHqN.js

CxrAiykYHqN.js

65 ms

GGJYiuJ569H.js

GGJYiuJ569H.js

72 ms

Glud--w-qOK.js

Glud--w-qOK.js

36 ms

POPhtNuypTE.js

POPhtNuypTE.js

70 ms

p55HfXW__mM.js

p55HfXW__mM.js

71 ms

ALTQi95mOyD.js

ALTQi95mOyD.js

75 ms

309568497_481319330682852_1856959341082368039_n.jpg

309568497_481319330682852_1856959341082368039_n.jpg

57 ms

309350855_481319334016185_211880164424102394_n.png

309350855_481319334016185_211880164424102394_n.png

94 ms

Dpom1HQzAgH.js

Dpom1HQzAgH.js

30 ms

VuRstRCPjmu.png

VuRstRCPjmu.png

28 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

949 ms

FB.png

FB.png

812 ms

Lin.png

Lin.png

796 ms

tw.png

tw.png

781 ms

insta.png

insta.png

923 ms

you.png

you.png

980 ms

Soundcloud.png

Soundcloud.png

876 ms

Transparent.png

Transparent.png

742 ms

Accessibility Review

cecr.in accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

cecr.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

cecr.in SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cecr.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cecr.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cecr.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cecr. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: