Tools & Wizards About Us
cemot.pl screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

cemot.pl

Cemot - warsztat & serwis samochodowy Mierzyn Szczecin

Page Load Speed

4.8 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

632 ms

cemot.pl screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Cemot content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cemot.pl

Serwis samochodowy Mierzyn Szczecin. Nasz warsztat samochodwy oferuje kompleksowe usługi serwisowania samochodów w Szczecinie. Zapraszamy do naszego serwisu.

Visit cemot.pl

Key Findings

We analyzed Cemot.pl page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cemot.pl performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.6 s

17/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,430 ms

15/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.5 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.cemot.pl

1114 ms

js

63 ms

style.min.css

319 ms

style.css

540 ms

style.css

332 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Cemot.pl, 15% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Cemot.pl.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 434.2 kB (21%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cemot.pl main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 67.1 kB

  • Original 82.7 kB
  • After minification 75.8 kB
  • After compression 15.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 33.2 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cemot images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 333.2 kB

  • Original 770.0 kB
  • After minification 770.0 kB
  • After compression 436.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 333.2 kB or 43% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 726 B

  • Original 128.2 kB
  • After minification 128.0 kB
  • After compression 127.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cemot.pl has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (75%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cemot. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.cemot.pl

www.cemot.pl

1114 ms

js

js

63 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

319 ms

style.css

style.css

540 ms

style.css

style.css

332 ms

css

css

38 ms

front.min.css

front.min.css

330 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

458 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

421 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

438 ms

ds-script.js

ds-script.js

437 ms

et-core-unified-tb-9-tb-67-2-17190411138641.min.css

et-core-unified-tb-9-tb-67-2-17190411138641.min.css

438 ms

et-core-unified-2-17190404012701.min.css

et-core-unified-2-17190404012701.min.css

524 ms

slick.css

slick.css

563 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

564 ms

style.css

style.css

563 ms

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

565 ms

custom.unified.js

custom.unified.js

722 ms

es6-promise.auto.min.js

es6-promise.auto.min.js

564 ms

api.js

api.js

40 ms

recaptcha.js

recaptcha.js

566 ms

frontend-bundle.min.js

frontend-bundle.min.js

564 ms

common.js

common.js

565 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

566 ms

script.js

script.js

567 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

224 ms

warsztat-samochodowy-szczecin.jpg

warsztat-samochodowy-szczecin.jpg

651 ms

AdobeStock_92735087-1024x683.jpg

AdobeStock_92735087-1024x683.jpg

510 ms

AdobeStock_238265467-1024x684.jpg

AdobeStock_238265467-1024x684.jpg

509 ms

AdobeStock_235902703-1024x683.jpg

AdobeStock_235902703-1024x683.jpg

510 ms

cemot-img-01.jpg

cemot-img-01.jpg

1125 ms

cemot-op.png

cemot-op.png

764 ms

icon-03.jpg

icon-03.jpg

635 ms

02.jpg

02.jpg

869 ms

icon-04.png

icon-04.png

632 ms

op3.jpg

op3.jpg

761 ms

cemot-img-03.jpg

cemot-img-03.jpg

848 ms

pp-cemot.jpg

pp-cemot.jpg

1081 ms

cemot-gwarancja.png

cemot-gwarancja.png

802 ms

cemot-op2.png

cemot-op2.png

833 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf

39 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

66 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf

78 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzc.ttf

81 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

80 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc9.ttf

78 ms

modules.ttf

modules.ttf

319 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

111 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

122 ms

anchor

anchor

36 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

4 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

11 ms

HLDS0lGvjhaHZ-h3T_KWQdivWM70PjtZZZPniKjPEwQ.js

HLDS0lGvjhaHZ-h3T_KWQdivWM70PjtZZZPniKjPEwQ.js

81 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

76 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

61 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

22 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

21 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff

21 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

25 ms

Accessibility Review

cemot.pl accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

cemot.pl best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

cemot.pl SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    PL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cemot.pl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Polish. Our system also found out that Cemot.pl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cemot.pl

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cemot. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: