Tools & Wizards About Us
cenobio.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 59

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

cenobio.com

Hotels Portofino coast area 4 star Italy - Hotel Cenobio Camogli

Page Load Speed

5.3 sec in total

First Response

379 ms

Resources Loaded

4.5 sec

Page Rendered

414 ms

cenobio.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Cenobio content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cenobio.com

4 star Hotel Cenobio dei Dogi offers you luxury holidays in Portofino Coast area, Italy, in the Italian Riviera, with comfortable and spacious suites and rooms directly on the sea

Visit cenobio.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cenobio.com page load time and found that the first response time was 379 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cenobio.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.2 s

20/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,750 ms

10/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.136

80/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.3 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cenobio.com

379 ms

home

445 ms

jquery-ui.css

27 ms

jquery.min.js

40 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

58 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Cenobio.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Cdn.iubenda.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Cenobio.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 87.0 kB (4%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cenobio.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 41.4 kB

  • Original 52.4 kB
  • After minification 45.3 kB
  • After compression 11.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.1 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 15.2 kB

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cenobio images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

  • Original 187.7 kB
  • After minification 187.7 kB
  • After compression 184.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 27.2 kB

  • Original 32.8 kB
  • After minification 27.7 kB
  • After compression 5.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cenobio.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 27.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (52%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cenobio. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cenobio.com

cenobio.com

379 ms

home

home

445 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

27 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

40 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

58 ms

globalize-en.js

globalize-en.js

225 ms

cenobio.js

cenobio.js

96 ms

css2

css2

57 ms

iconify-icon.min.js

iconify-icon.min.js

184 ms

common

common

899 ms

jquery

jquery

674 ms

globalize-en.js

globalize-en.js

256 ms

home.css

home.css

255 ms

cenobio.js

cenobio.js

22 ms

1219154.js

1219154.js

128 ms

stub-v2.js

stub-v2.js

55 ms

safe-tcf-v2.js

safe-tcf-v2.js

60 ms

stub.js

stub.js

9 ms

iubenda_cs.js

iubenda_cs.js

20 ms

searchbox

searchbox

1129 ms

common

common

224 ms

jquery.ui.datepicker-en.js

jquery.ui.datepicker-en.js

119 ms

jquery.vide.js

jquery.vide.js

262 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

83 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

136 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

91 ms

poster.jpg

poster.jpg

565 ms

scroll.png

scroll.png

143 ms

ombra-bottom.png

ombra-bottom.png

144 ms

ombra-top.png

ombra-top.png

144 ms

logo02.png

logo02.png

387 ms

tel.png

tel.png

120 ms

chat.png

chat.png

211 ms

email.png

email.png

213 ms

home01.jpg

home01.jpg

1323 ms

spiaggia.jpg

spiaggia.jpg

417 ms

piscina.jpg

piscina.jpg

651 ms

terrazza.jpg

terrazza.jpg

451 ms

bg-footer.jpg

bg-footer.jpg

647 ms

logo03.png

logo03.png

451 ms

logo-digiside2.png

logo-digiside2.png

547 ms

btn-newsletter.jpg

btn-newsletter.jpg

564 ms

telegram.png

telegram.png

647 ms

bg-booking.jpg

bg-booking.jpg

1839 ms

2sDfZG1Wl4Lcnbu6iQ.ttf

2sDfZG1Wl4Lcnbu6iQ.ttf

61 ms

2sDcZG1Wl4LcnbuCJW8Dbw.ttf

2sDcZG1Wl4LcnbuCJW8Dbw.ttf

114 ms

2sDcZG1Wl4LcnbuCNWgDbw.ttf

2sDcZG1Wl4LcnbuCNWgDbw.ttf

113 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

675 ms

yYLl0h7Wyfzjyw.ttf

yYLl0h7Wyfzjyw.ttf

92 ms

988834414507134

988834414507134

113 ms

js

js

59 ms

destination

destination

167 ms

searchboxpowered.png

searchboxpowered.png

235 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

30 ms

poster2023.gif

poster2023.gif

316 ms

poster2023.jpg

poster2023.jpg

1812 ms

poster2023.png

poster2023.png

341 ms

home

home

253 ms

home

home

795 ms

home

home

482 ms

four_global_3.js

four_global_3.js

13 ms

four_global_3.js

four_global_3.js

2 ms

Accessibility Review

cenobio.com accessibility score

59

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

cenobio.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

cenobio.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cenobio.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cenobio.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cenobio.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cenobio. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: