Tools & Wizards About Us
healthmark.biz screenshot

Report Summary

  • 94

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

healthmark.biz

Healthmark Industries Company, Inc eCommerce Site - Home

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

257 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

89 ms

healthmark.biz screenshot

About Website

Visit healthmark.biz now to see the best up-to-date Healthmark content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about healthmark.biz

Products for the sterilization, decontamination, storage and security of surgical instruments and other medical devices and accessories.

Visit healthmark.biz

Key Findings

We analyzed Healthmark.biz page load time and found that the first response time was 257 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

healthmark.biz performance score

94

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

77/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

92/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.5 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.04

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.6 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

healthmark.biz

257 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

92 ms

jquery-ui-1.13.0.min.js

1184 ms

json2.js

67 ms

jstorage.js

67 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Healthmark.biz and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Healthmark.biz.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 62.1 kB (33%)

Content Size

186.5 kB

After Optimization

124.4 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Healthmark.biz main page is 186.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 162.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 10.9 kB

  • Original 14.8 kB
  • After minification 13.9 kB
  • After compression 3.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.9 kB or 74% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 49.2 kB

  • Original 162.2 kB
  • After minification 158.5 kB
  • After compression 113.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 49.2 kB or 30% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 9.5 kB
  • After minification 9.5 kB
  • After compression 7.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Healthmark.biz needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.9 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (82%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Healthmark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

healthmark.biz

healthmark.biz

257 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

92 ms

jquery-ui-1.13.0.min.js

jquery-ui-1.13.0.min.js

1184 ms

json2.js

json2.js

67 ms

jstorage.js

jstorage.js

67 ms

custom.css.aspx

custom.css.aspx

254 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

73 ms

storefront.js

storefront.js

101 ms

storefront.ie10.js

storefront.ie10.js

100 ms

jquery.producthistory.js

jquery.producthistory.js

103 ms

CategoryTree.js

CategoryTree.js

115 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

117 ms

defaultButtons.js

defaultButtons.js

114 ms

site_logo.gif

site_logo.gif

131 ms

top_nav_btn_home.gif

top_nav_btn_home.gif

132 ms

top_nav_btn_about.gif

top_nav_btn_about.gif

132 ms

top_nav_btn_contact.gif

top_nav_btn_contact.gif

129 ms

top_nav_btn_account.gif

top_nav_btn_account.gif

130 ms

top_nav_bg.gif

top_nav_bg.gif

128 ms

top_nav_btn_cart.gif

top_nav_btn_cart.gif

173 ms

mod_head_category_lt.gif

mod_head_category_lt.gif

179 ms

mod_head_search_lt.gif

mod_head_search_lt.gif

175 ms

mod_btn_go.gif

mod_btn_go.gif

180 ms

mod_head_login_rt.gif

mod_head_login_rt.gif

178 ms

mod_btn_signin.gif

mod_btn_signin.gif

177 ms

mod_head_mail_rt.gif

mod_head_mail_rt.gif

213 ms

mod_head_cart_rt.gif

mod_head_cart_rt.gif

216 ms

mod_body_bg_tl.gif

mod_body_bg_tl.gif

206 ms

mod_body_bg_tp.gif

mod_body_bg_tp.gif

207 ms

mod_body_bg_tr.gif

mod_body_bg_tr.gif

208 ms

mod_body_bg_lt.gif

mod_body_bg_lt.gif

207 ms

mod_body_bg_rt.gif

mod_body_bg_rt.gif

234 ms

mod_body_bg_bl.gif

mod_body_bg_bl.gif

240 ms

mod_body_bg_bt.gif

mod_body_bg_bt.gif

239 ms

mod_body_bg_br.gif

mod_body_bg_br.gif

243 ms

Accessibility Review

healthmark.biz accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

healthmark.biz best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

healthmark.biz SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Healthmark.biz can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Healthmark.biz main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

healthmark.biz

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Healthmark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: