Tools & Wizards About Us
checkcomparison.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 71

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

checkcomparison.de

TARIFECHECK24 - kfz-versicherung Versicherungen, Kredit, Strom, DSL & Reisen im Vergleich

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

322 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

373 ms

checkcomparison.de screenshot

About Website

Welcome to checkcomparison.de homepage info - get ready to check Checkcomparison best content right away, or after learning these important things about checkcomparison.de

CheckComparison.de - Das Vergleicheportal: Sparen Sie mit den beliebten Vergleichsrechnern! Kredite Versicherungen, Gas, Strom-, DSL-Tarife, Reisen und Flüge im Vergleich.

Visit checkcomparison.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Checkcomparison.de page load time and found that the first response time was 322 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

checkcomparison.de performance score

71

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

73/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

37/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value270 ms

82/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.059

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.7 s

56/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

checkcomparison.de

322 ms

layout.min.css

249 ms

jquery.libs.js

773 ms

check24.min.js

220 ms

poweredby_FFFFFF.gif

8 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Checkcomparison.de, 79% (50 requests) were made to Check24.net and 3% (2 requests) were made to Vergleichend-sparen.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Check24.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 271.3 kB (16%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Checkcomparison.de main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 25.5 kB

  • Original 30.4 kB
  • After minification 26.9 kB
  • After compression 4.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.4 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 14.2 kB

  • Original 443.7 kB
  • After minification 429.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Checkcomparison images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 201.5 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 913.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 201.5 kB or 18% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 30.1 kB

  • Original 75.4 kB
  • After minification 75.4 kB
  • After compression 45.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Checkcomparison.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 30.1 kB or 40% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (26%)

Requests Now

61

After Optimization

45

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Checkcomparison. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

checkcomparison.de

checkcomparison.de

322 ms

layout.min.css

layout.min.css

249 ms

jquery.libs.js

jquery.libs.js

773 ms

check24.min.js

check24.min.js

220 ms

poweredby_FFFFFF.gif

poweredby_FFFFFF.gif

8 ms

0.gif

0.gif

111 ms

check24_sprite.png

check24_sprite.png

257 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

12 ms

collect

collect

34 ms

check24_sprite.png

check24_sprite.png

658 ms

129 ms

e.js

e.js

558 ms

023839e5-core.css

023839e5-core.css

204 ms

check24-white.svg

check24-white.svg

289 ms

1c5857a8-core.libraries.js

1c5857a8-core.libraries.js

664 ms

7be2e028-core.js

7be2e028-core.js

408 ms

babel.min.js

babel.min.js

890 ms

button-phone.png

button-phone.png

348 ms

guenstiger-schneller-einfacher-844x500.png

guenstiger-schneller-einfacher-844x500.png

647 ms

nirgendwo-guenstiger-garantie.svg

nirgendwo-guenstiger-garantie.svg

380 ms

2019-tuevsued-logo.svg

2019-tuevsued-logo.svg

450 ms

newsletter-icon.svg

newsletter-icon.svg

478 ms

tonlinedsl.jpg

tonlinedsl.jpg

790 ms

1und1dsl.png

1und1dsl.png

548 ms

o2dsl.png

o2dsl.png

572 ms

pyur-logo.png

pyur-logo.png

648 ms

vodafonedsl.png

vodafonedsl.png

685 ms

mnet.png

mnet.png

747 ms

ewedsl.png

ewedsl.png

747 ms

congstardsl.png

congstardsl.png

756 ms

easybell.png

easybell.png

780 ms

swbdsl.png

swbdsl.png

845 ms

netcologne.png

netcologne.png

846 ms

osnatel.png

osnatel.png

850 ms

fonial-logo.png

fonial-logo.png

875 ms

htp-logo.png

htp-logo.png

1012 ms

inexio-logo.png

inexio-logo.png

1014 ms

antec-logo.png

antec-logo.png

1015 ms

dnsnet-logo.png

dnsnet-logo.png

1014 ms

netaachen.png

netaachen.png

1014 ms

mdcc.png

mdcc.png

1015 ms

an-.png

an-.png

1015 ms

regionet.png

regionet.png

1037 ms

fiete-net.png

fiete-net.png

1042 ms

erz-net.png

erz-net.png

1043 ms

einert.png

einert.png

1065 ms

schnell-im-netz.png

schnell-im-netz.png

1077 ms

footer-logo.svg

footer-logo.svg

1077 ms

home.svg

home.svg

909 ms

strom.svg

strom.svg

861 ms

gas.svg

gas.svg

801 ms

kfz.svg

kfz.svg

784 ms

kredit.svg

kredit.svg

774 ms

internet.svg

internet.svg

720 ms

handytarife.svg

handytarife.svg

750 ms

urlaub.svg

urlaub.svg

697 ms

mietwagen.svg

mietwagen.svg

674 ms

service.svg

service.svg

614 ms

c24-sprite.png

c24-sprite.png

624 ms

stoerer-oval.svg

stoerer-oval.svg

604 ms

checkbox.png

checkbox.png

639 ms

t.js

t.js

111 ms

cntcc

cntcc

607 ms

Accessibility Review

checkcomparison.de accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

checkcomparison.de best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

checkcomparison.de SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Checkcomparison.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Checkcomparison.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

checkcomparison.de

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Checkcomparison. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: