Access choiceofpleasure.com. Local Horny Women Near Me - Find a Fuck Buddy Tonight!

choiceofpleasure.com screenshot

40

Performance

Renders faster than
59% of other websites
78

Accessibility

Visual factors better than
that of 45% of websites
67

Best Practices

More advanced features
available than in
24% of websites
100

SEO

Google-friendlier than
94% of websites

First Response

194 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

choiceofpleasure.com screenshot

About Website

Visit choiceofpleasure.com now to see the best up-to-date Choiceofpleasure content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about choiceofpleasure.com

Visit choiceofpleasure.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Choiceofpleasure.com page load time and found that the first response time was 194 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

38/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value650 ms

45/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.084

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.6 s

58/100

10%

www.choiceofpleasure.com

194 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

90 ms

style.css

164 ms

style.css

114 ms

style.css

82 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Choiceofpleasure.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (663 ms) relates to the external source Xwork.co.uk.

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Choiceofpleasure.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 38.3 kB

Original 48.3 kB
After minification 42.6 kB
After compression 10.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.7 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.3 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 46.7 kB

Original 1.2 MB
After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Choiceofpleasure images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 9.9 kB

Original 36.2 kB
After minification 36.2 kB
After compression 26.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 9.9 kB or 27% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 30.6 kB

Original 106.3 kB
After minification 106.3 kB
After compression 75.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Choiceofpleasure.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 30.6 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

22

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Choiceofpleasure. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Choiceofpleasure.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Choiceofpleasure.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

choiceofpleasure.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Choiceofpleasure. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: