Tools & Wizards About Us
cispl.io screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

cispl.io

#1 CRM, Web Design and Website Development Company | CodeClouds

Page Load Speed

14.4 sec in total

First Response

70 ms

Resources Loaded

12.8 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

cispl.io screenshot

About Website

Welcome to cispl.io homepage info - get ready to check Cispl best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about cispl.io

Our team of brand design experts and developers take care of all your CRM solutions, Creative Design, Web & App development, CMS, eCommerce and more!

Visit cispl.io

Key Findings

We analyzed Cispl.io page load time and found that the first response time was 70 ms and then it took 14.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cispl.io performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,060 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.2 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cispl.io

70 ms

cispl.io

38 ms

www.codeclouds.com

159 ms

cdda83a1e84137cd.css

119 ms

7deb60c4a213d4dd.css

101 ms

Our browser made a total of 137 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Cispl.io, 98% (134 requests) were made to Codeclouds.com and 1% (1 request) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (10.5 sec) relates to the external source Codeclouds.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 368.2 kB (17%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Cispl.io main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 359.9 kB

  • Original 418.5 kB
  • After minification 418.1 kB
  • After compression 58.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 359.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 8.2 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cispl images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 17 B

  • Original 655 B
  • After minification 655 B
  • After compression 638 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (38%)

Requests Now

132

After Optimization

82

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 132 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cispl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cispl.io

cispl.io

70 ms

cispl.io

cispl.io

38 ms

www.codeclouds.com

www.codeclouds.com

159 ms

cdda83a1e84137cd.css

cdda83a1e84137cd.css

119 ms

7deb60c4a213d4dd.css

7deb60c4a213d4dd.css

101 ms

65cf9135f0467d48.css

65cf9135f0467d48.css

92 ms

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

78 ms

webpack-d1434ef66ff21760.js

webpack-d1434ef66ff21760.js

83 ms

framework-2c79e2a64abdb08b.js

framework-2c79e2a64abdb08b.js

115 ms

main-59d495e9906e2c28.js

main-59d495e9906e2c28.js

193 ms

_app-1a169af2c310feca.js

_app-1a169af2c310feca.js

195 ms

124-ff36615789af4f1a.js

124-ff36615789af4f1a.js

199 ms

546-1c0f321038439494.js

546-1c0f321038439494.js

199 ms

883-2d3f7bccd396a847.js

883-2d3f7bccd396a847.js

195 ms

584-e60949b25ed12f1b.js

584-e60949b25ed12f1b.js

244 ms

231-f20719b611c610fd.js

231-f20719b611c610fd.js

255 ms

index-3d659d623b4f7bbb.js

index-3d659d623b4f7bbb.js

257 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

257 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

258 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

182 ms

200 ms

197 ms

202 ms

204 ms

codeclouds-video-fallback.3517de71.webp

codeclouds-video-fallback.3517de71.webp

203 ms

206 ms

231 ms

215 ms

215 ms

232 ms

303 ms

287 ms

410 ms

445 ms

417 ms

974 ms

649 ms

941 ms

990 ms

1036 ms

599 ms

1357 ms

1472 ms

1551 ms

1616 ms

1667 ms

1674 ms

1773 ms

1623 ms

1847 ms

1691 ms

1702 ms

1796 ms

1906 ms

1911 ms

1768 ms

1800 ms

1750 ms

1786 ms

1836 ms

1924 ms

remixicon.8032ccac.woff

remixicon.8032ccac.woff

1966 ms

PAJJhLM6sSoWKfWCAAwDAjgbRAAB42mNgYGBkAIIbCZo5IPrmUn0hGA0AO8EFTQAA

PAJJhLM6sSoWKfWCAAwDAjgbRAAB42mNgYGBkAIIbCZo5IPrmUn0hGA0AO8EFTQAA

4 ms

1960 ms

10473 ms

10459 ms

10451 ms

10402 ms

10390 ms

10284 ms

10277 ms

10250 ms

10097 ms

10048 ms

9758 ms

9726 ms

9704 ms

9662 ms

9342 ms

9228 ms

9151 ms

9085 ms

9067 ms

9032 ms

9026 ms

8956 ms

8942 ms

8927 ms

8842 ms

8809 ms

8762 ms

8749 ms

8742 ms

8732 ms

8728 ms

8717 ms

8683 ms

8588 ms

8546 ms

8532 ms

98 ms

95 ms

104 ms

115 ms

96 ms

109 ms

163 ms

171 ms

188 ms

917 ms

237 ms

721 ms

689 ms

233 ms

698 ms

836 ms

1081 ms

979 ms

1068 ms

1088 ms

1018 ms

1627 ms

1531 ms

1340 ms

1221 ms

1661 ms

1221 ms

1285 ms

1274 ms

1332 ms

1343 ms

1429 ms

1417 ms

1440 ms

1467 ms

1499 ms

1435 ms

Accessibility Review

cispl.io accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

cispl.io best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

cispl.io SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cispl.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cispl.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cispl.io

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cispl. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: