Tools & Wizards About Us
cleanchoiceenergy.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

cleanchoiceenergy.com

Switch to Clean Renewable Energy | CleanChoice Energy 100% Wind & Solar

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

10 ms

Resources Loaded

391 ms

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

cleanchoiceenergy.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to cleanchoiceenergy.com homepage info - get ready to check Clean Choice Energy best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about cleanchoiceenergy.com

Sign up for CleanChoice Energy in just a few minutes. It's 100% clean, renewable energy from wind and solar farms - with no new fees, and no new equipment.

Visit cleanchoiceenergy.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cleanchoiceenergy.com page load time and found that the first response time was 10 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cleanchoiceenergy.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

56/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,710 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.015

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.9 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cleanchoiceenergy.com

10 ms

cleanchoiceenergy.com

188 ms

app-YT2QKWYT.css

12 ms

css2

35 ms

81b171e18e973f822535b8f75e01bdf3.js

28 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Cleanchoiceenergy.com, 77% (33 requests) were made to Images.ctfassets.net and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (188 ms) belongs to the original domain Cleanchoiceenergy.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (8%)

Content Size

15.4 MB

After Optimization

14.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Cleanchoiceenergy.com main page is 15.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 14.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 473.0 kB

  • Original 567.3 kB
  • After minification 567.3 kB
  • After compression 94.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 473.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 708.5 kB

  • Original 14.8 MB
  • After minification 14.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Clean Choice Energy images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 111 B

  • Original 42.1 kB
  • After minification 42.1 kB
  • After compression 42.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (10%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

37

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Clean Choice Energy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cleanchoiceenergy.com

cleanchoiceenergy.com

10 ms

cleanchoiceenergy.com

cleanchoiceenergy.com

188 ms

app-YT2QKWYT.css

app-YT2QKWYT.css

12 ms

css2

css2

35 ms

81b171e18e973f822535b8f75e01bdf3.js

81b171e18e973f822535b8f75e01bdf3.js

28 ms

friendbuy.min.js

friendbuy.min.js

22 ms

manifest-00E00B64.js

manifest-00E00B64.js

9 ms

entry.client-YDJIBVVW.js

entry.client-YDJIBVVW.js

10 ms

cce-logo-stacked.svg

cce-logo-stacked.svg

57 ms

the_guardian_transparent.svg

the_guardian_transparent.svg

46 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

72 ms

washingtonian_transparent.svg

washingtonian_transparent.svg

19 ms

smithsonian_transparent.svg

smithsonian_transparent.svg

24 ms

washingtonbusinessjournal.svg

washingtonbusinessjournal.svg

17 ms

axios.svg

axios.svg

21 ms

NewYorkTimes.svg

NewYorkTimes.svg

22 ms

Value-prop-easiest-way.jpg

Value-prop-easiest-way.jpg

29 ms

Value-prop-cleaner.jpg

Value-prop-cleaner.jpg

35 ms

Value-prop-choices.jpg

Value-prop-choices.jpg

33 ms

Value-prop-greenest-life.jpg

Value-prop-greenest-life.jpg

33 ms

impact-icon.svg

impact-icon.svg

27 ms

star.svg

star.svg

30 ms

testimonial-lauren.jpg

testimonial-lauren.jpg

34 ms

testimonial-elise.jpg

testimonial-elise.jpg

36 ms

testimonial-jane.jpg

testimonial-jane.jpg

35 ms

testimonial-patricia.jpg

testimonial-patricia.jpg

37 ms

testimonial-donna.jpg

testimonial-donna.jpg

36 ms

testimonial-douglas.jpg

testimonial-douglas.jpg

37 ms

Vector__1_.svg

Vector__1_.svg

38 ms

Group.svg

Group.svg

38 ms

work-from-home-energy-saving-tips.jpg

work-from-home-energy-saving-tips.jpg

49 ms

carbon-footprint.jpg

carbon-footprint.jpg

65 ms

rocky-mountain-national-park.jpg

rocky-mountain-national-park.jpg

89 ms

teach-kids-about-environment.jpg

teach-kids-about-environment.jpg

63 ms

Quote_Icon.svg

Quote_Icon.svg

40 ms

Best-for-the-world-environment-logo.png

Best-for-the-world-environment-logo.png

45 ms

bbb-accredited-business_2x.png

bbb-accredited-business_2x.png

49 ms

gold-green-america-certified-business_2x.png

gold-green-america-certified-business_2x.png

54 ms

Deloitte_Fast500_logo.png

Deloitte_Fast500_logo.png

54 ms

footer-facebook-icon.svg

footer-facebook-icon.svg

57 ms

footer-twitter-icon.svg

footer-twitter-icon.svg

58 ms

footer-instagram-icon.svg

footer-instagram-icon.svg

61 ms

footer-linkedin-logo-new.svg

footer-linkedin-logo-new.svg

64 ms

Accessibility Review

cleanchoiceenergy.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

cleanchoiceenergy.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

cleanchoiceenergy.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cleanchoiceenergy.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cleanchoiceenergy.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cleanchoiceenergy.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Clean Choice Energy. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: