Tools & Wizards About Us
click-test.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 78

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

click-test.com

► Click Test / Click Speed Test / CPS Test

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

50 ms

Resources Loaded

824 ms

Page Rendered

769 ms

click-test.com screenshot

About Website

Visit click-test.com now to see the best up-to-date Click Test content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about click-test.com

CLICK TEST / CLICK SPEED TEST ✔ Test how fast you can click in 7 different click modes! Clicks in 1/5/10/20/60/100/1000 seconds. Test your CPS now!

Visit click-test.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Click-test.com page load time and found that the first response time was 50 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

click-test.com performance score

78

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

74/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

68/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value190 ms

90/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.026

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.6 s

57/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

click-test.com

50 ms

click-test.com

40 ms

www.click-test.com

146 ms

3566091532-css_bundle_v2.css

82 ms

sharethis.js

120 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 17% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Click-test.com, 17% (4 requests) were made to Blogger.com and 9% (2 requests) were made to Jsc.mgid.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (506 ms) relates to the external source 2.bp.blogspot.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 185.7 kB (42%)

Content Size

441.8 kB

After Optimization

256.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Click-test.com main page is 441.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 257.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 66.3 kB

  • Original 83.0 kB
  • After minification 83.0 kB
  • After compression 16.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.3 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 116.0 kB

  • Original 257.7 kB
  • After minification 141.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Click Test needs image optimization as it can save up to 116.0 kB or 45% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 93.4 kB
  • After minification 93.4 kB
  • After compression 89.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2 B

  • Original 7.8 kB
  • After minification 7.8 kB
  • After compression 7.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Click-test.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (68%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

6

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Click Test. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

click-test.com

click-test.com

50 ms

click-test.com

click-test.com

40 ms

www.click-test.com

www.click-test.com

146 ms

3566091532-css_bundle_v2.css

3566091532-css_bundle_v2.css

82 ms

sharethis.js

sharethis.js

120 ms

jquery-1.12.0.min.js

jquery-1.12.0.min.js

85 ms

click-test.com.823043.js

click-test.com.823043.js

129 ms

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

192 ms

emPoll.js

emPoll.js

121 ms

element.js

element.js

140 ms

click-test.com.976825.js

click-test.com.976825.js

144 ms

3717461131-widgets.js

3717461131-widgets.js

120 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

65 ms

mouse-160592%2Bweb%2Bhinter.png

mouse-160592%2Bweb%2Bhinter.png

506 ms

black50.png

black50.png

109 ms

white80.png

white80.png

109 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

71 ms

summary

summary

206 ms

authorization.css

authorization.css

100 ms

collect

collect

20 ms

js

js

65 ms

authorization.css

authorization.css

25 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

28 ms

Accessibility Review

click-test.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

click-test.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

click-test.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Click-test.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Click-test.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

click-test.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Click Test. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: