Tools & Wizards About Us
cmeprocessservice.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

cmeprocessservice.com

Citations served, Collections proceeding process server, Foreclosures Process Service at Nassau County

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

32 ms

Resources Loaded

988 ms

Page Rendered

485 ms

cmeprocessservice.com screenshot

About Website

Visit cmeprocessservice.com now to see the best up-to-date Cme Process Service content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cmeprocessservice.com

Cmeprocessservice.com offers Citations served, Collections proceeding process server, Custody proceeding process server, Depositions process server, Process Server, Process Service, at Nassau County, ...

Visit cmeprocessservice.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cmeprocessservice.com page load time and found that the first response time was 32 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cmeprocessservice.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value33.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,640 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.17

70/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.6 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cmeprocessservice.com

32 ms

www.cmeprocessservice.com

63 ms

js

83 ms

style.css

20 ms

responsive.css

35 ms

Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Cmeprocessservice.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (520 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 232.0 kB (3%)

Content Size

8.4 MB

After Optimization

8.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cmeprocessservice.com main page is 8.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 7.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 41.7 kB

  • Original 49.2 kB
  • After minification 40.8 kB
  • After compression 7.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.4 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 60.8 kB

  • Original 7.5 MB
  • After minification 7.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cme Process Service images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 90.2 kB

  • Original 671.4 kB
  • After minification 671.4 kB
  • After compression 581.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 90.2 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 39.3 kB

  • Original 117.6 kB
  • After minification 108.8 kB
  • After compression 78.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cmeprocessservice.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 39.3 kB or 33% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (72%)

Requests Now

76

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cme Process Service. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cmeprocessservice.com

cmeprocessservice.com

32 ms

www.cmeprocessservice.com

www.cmeprocessservice.com

63 ms

js

js

83 ms

style.css

style.css

20 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

35 ms

css

css

77 ms

css

css

122 ms

css2

css2

121 ms

api.js

api.js

165 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

59 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

38 ms

jquery-ui.js

jquery-ui.js

162 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

39 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

39 ms

js

js

62 ms

gmap.js

gmap.js

51 ms

jquery.mixitup.min.js

jquery.mixitup.min.js

59 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

39 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

56 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

54 ms

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

59 ms

revolution.extension.carousel.min.js

revolution.extension.carousel.min.js

59 ms

revolution.extension.kenburn.min.js

revolution.extension.kenburn.min.js

60 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

62 ms

revolution.extension.migration.min.js

revolution.extension.migration.min.js

61 ms

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

75 ms

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

61 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

68 ms

revolution.extension.video.min.js

revolution.extension.video.min.js

67 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

68 ms

jquery.polyglot.language.switcher.js

jquery.polyglot.language.switcher.js

68 ms

nouislider.js

nouislider.js

72 ms

jquery.bootstrap-touchspin.js

jquery.bootstrap-touchspin.js

71 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

70 ms

jquery.countTo.js

jquery.countTo.js

70 ms

jquery.counterup.min.js

jquery.counterup.min.js

73 ms

custom.js

custom.js

115 ms

css

css

146 ms

css

css

147 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

103 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

96 ms

settings.css

settings.css

113 ms

layers.css

layers.css

116 ms

navigation.css

navigation.css

121 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

127 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

126 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

126 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

117 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

111 ms

polyglot-language-switcher.css

polyglot-language-switcher.css

116 ms

nouislider.css

nouislider.css

116 ms

nouislider.pips.css

nouislider.pips.css

115 ms

jquery.bootstrap-touchspin.css

jquery.bootstrap-touchspin.css

108 ms

masterslider.css

masterslider.css

101 ms

style.css

style.css

101 ms

ms-vertical.css

ms-vertical.css

103 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

419 ms

logo.png

logo.png

238 ms

slider2.png

slider2.png

442 ms

slider1.png

slider1.png

445 ms

1.png

1.png

266 ms

2.png

2.png

342 ms

3.png

3.png

267 ms

5.png

5.png

336 ms

4.png

4.png

343 ms

6.png

6.png

343 ms

thumb1.png

thumb1.png

435 ms

bg.png

bg.png

428 ms

c2.png

c2.png

429 ms

photo.png

photo.png

430 ms

f-bg.png

f-bg.png

445 ms

fb.png

fb.png

430 ms

tw.png

tw.png

431 ms

li.png

li.png

431 ms

js

js

320 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

399 ms

vm8vdRf0T0bS1ffgsPB7WZ-mD17_ytV3Mg.ttf

vm8vdRf0T0bS1ffgsPB7WZ-mD17_ytV3Mg.ttf

520 ms

Flaticon.svg

Flaticon.svg

401 ms

Flaticon.woff

Flaticon.woff

399 ms

fontawesome-webfont3295.woff

fontawesome-webfont3295.woff

400 ms

EJRSQgYoZZY2vCFuvAnt66qSVy7Vp8NA.ttf

EJRSQgYoZZY2vCFuvAnt66qSVy7Vp8NA.ttf

518 ms

EJRVQgYoZZY2vCFuvAFWzrq_dSb_.ttf

EJRVQgYoZZY2vCFuvAFWzrq_dSb_.ttf

520 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

170 ms

revicons90c6.woff

revicons90c6.woff

166 ms

collect

collect

65 ms

Accessibility Review

cmeprocessservice.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

cmeprocessservice.com best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

cmeprocessservice.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cmeprocessservice.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cmeprocessservice.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cmeprocessservice.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cme Process Service. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: