Tools & Wizards About Us
comparedrawdown.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

comparedrawdown.co.uk

Compare Drawdown - Best Drawdown Pensions

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

224 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

554 ms

comparedrawdown.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit comparedrawdown.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Compare Drawdown content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about comparedrawdown.co.uk

PENSION DRAWDOWN Take Control Of Your Future With Pension Drawdown Free Drawdown Guide Why Compare Drawdown? Regulated Advice Firm We are fully regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority so all the ...

Visit comparedrawdown.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Comparedrawdown.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 224 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

comparedrawdown.co.uk performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value22.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.6 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,530 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

comparedrawdown.co.uk

224 ms

comparedrawdown.co.uk

982 ms

style.min.css

89 ms

wpautoterms.css

174 ms

styles.css

259 ms

Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Comparedrawdown.co.uk, 7% (6 requests) were made to P.clarity.ms and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Comparedrawdown.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 145.1 kB (5%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Comparedrawdown.co.uk main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 133.0 kB

  • Original 164.7 kB
  • After minification 159.7 kB
  • After compression 31.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 133.0 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 8.3 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Compare Drawdown images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 777.2 kB
  • After minification 777.2 kB
  • After compression 775.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 259.5 kB
  • After minification 259.3 kB
  • After compression 257.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Comparedrawdown.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (66%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Compare Drawdown. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

comparedrawdown.co.uk

comparedrawdown.co.uk

224 ms

comparedrawdown.co.uk

comparedrawdown.co.uk

982 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

89 ms

wpautoterms.css

wpautoterms.css

174 ms

styles.css

styles.css

259 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

259 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

260 ms

deprecated-style.min.css

deprecated-style.min.css

262 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

262 ms

style.css

style.css

261 ms

mailin-front.css

mailin-front.css

344 ms

gdpr-main.css

gdpr-main.css

346 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

430 ms

cmr_frontend.css

cmr_frontend.css

349 ms

a9601ab9555ca7c2b6cb41dbb0d3bfd1.min.css

a9601ab9555ca7c2b6cb41dbb0d3bfd1.min.css

692 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

434 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

429 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

431 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

432 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

602 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

515 ms

base.js

base.js

518 ms

js

js

75 ms

mailin-front.js

mailin-front.js

517 ms

jquery-confirm.min.js

jquery-confirm.min.js

521 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

600 ms

mouse.min.js

mouse.min.js

602 ms

slider.min.js

slider.min.js

603 ms

cmr_frontend.js

cmr_frontend.js

609 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

151 ms

index.js

index.js

684 ms

index.js

index.js

686 ms

api.js

api.js

40 ms

index.js

index.js

685 ms

main.js

main.js

858 ms

sp-scripts.min.js

sp-scripts.min.js

859 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

859 ms

1b7bce570690db8b21cd33e6fcae72a4.min.js

1b7bce570690db8b21cd33e6fcae72a4.min.js

1073 ms

api.js

api.js

58 ms

lik55mqifs

lik55mqifs

177 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

142 ms

comparedrawdown-logo.png

comparedrawdown-logo.png

204 ms

downarrow.gif

downarrow.gif

204 ms

spinner.gif

spinner.gif

204 ms

uparrow.gif

uparrow.gif

205 ms

icon1.png

icon1.png

205 ms

icon2.png

icon2.png

340 ms

icon3.png

icon3.png

339 ms

whitearrowup.png

whitearrowup.png

338 ms

image-2.jpg

image-2.jpg

712 ms

pexels-andrea-piacquadio-3823488-scaled.jpg

pexels-andrea-piacquadio-3823488-scaled.jpg

384 ms

expert.jpg

expert.jpg

564 ms

bluearrow.png

bluearrow.png

384 ms

books.png

books.png

624 ms

arrow-down.png

arrow-down.png

385 ms

comparedrawdown-logo-foot.png

comparedrawdown-logo-foot.png

453 ms

dummy-1-300x178.jpg

dummy-1-300x178.jpg

454 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

433 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

524 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

457 ms

awb-icons.woff

awb-icons.woff

457 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

516 ms

api.min.js

api.min.js

38 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

39 ms

clarity.js

clarity.js

50 ms

fallback

fallback

57 ms

fallback__ltr.css

fallback__ltr.css

3 ms

css

css

32 ms

collect

collect

27 ms

collect

collect

36 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

3 ms

collect

collect

53 ms

collect

collect

44 ms

collect

collect

76 ms

collect

collect

88 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

57 ms

ads

ads

94 ms

nunito-v8-latin-regular.woff

nunito-v8-latin-regular.woff

91 ms

nunito-v8-latin-700.woff

nunito-v8-latin-700.woff

91 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

22 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

27 ms

c.gif

c.gif

7 ms

Accessibility Review

comparedrawdown.co.uk accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

comparedrawdown.co.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

comparedrawdown.co.uk SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Comparedrawdown.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Comparedrawdown.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

comparedrawdown.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Compare Drawdown. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: