Tools & Wizards About Us
complexbar.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 60

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

complexbar.ru

Посуда для кафе, ресторанов, общепита и дома в Москва в Комплекс-Бар

Page Load Speed

9 sec in total

First Response

1.6 sec

Resources Loaded

5.2 sec

Page Rendered

2.1 sec

complexbar.ru screenshot

About Website

Welcome to complexbar.ru homepage info - get ready to check Complexbar best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about complexbar.ru

Купить посуду и оборудование оптом и в розницу для дома, ресторанов, кафе, баров и общепита в Москве по выгодным ценам с доставкой

Visit complexbar.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Complexbar.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 7.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

complexbar.ru performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value54.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80,130 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.114

86/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value119.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

complexbar.ru

1640 ms

standalone.9e80656a980e62b562fa880fcbbaec61.css

894 ms

suggestions.css

17 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

139 ms

scripts-0eb46f1a7528271f8c56c1306805c811.js

558 ms

Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Complexbar.ru, 7% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net and 7% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) relates to the external source Jz9czo0xs6.ru.scalesta-cdn.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (74%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

429.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Complexbar.ru main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 124.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 5.7 kB

  • Original 16.9 kB
  • After minification 11.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Complexbar needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.7 kB or 34% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

  • Original 134.7 kB
  • After minification 134.7 kB
  • After compression 102.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 24% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 8.2 kB

  • Original 199.8 kB
  • After minification 199.8 kB
  • After compression 191.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Complexbar.ru has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (57%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Complexbar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

complexbar.ru

complexbar.ru

1640 ms

standalone.9e80656a980e62b562fa880fcbbaec61.css

standalone.9e80656a980e62b562fa880fcbbaec61.css

894 ms

suggestions.css

suggestions.css

17 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

139 ms

scripts-0eb46f1a7528271f8c56c1306805c811.js

scripts-0eb46f1a7528271f8c56c1306805c811.js

558 ms

jquery.suggestions.min.js

jquery.suggestions.min.js

5 ms

abt__ut2_column_calculator.js

abt__ut2_column_calculator.js

379 ms

product_image_gallery.js

product_image_gallery.js

380 ms

tabs.js

tabs.js

384 ms

popups.js

popups.js

387 ms

popups_init.js

popups_init.js

504 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

580 ms

https%3A%2F%2Fcomplexbar.ru%2Fimages%2Fabt__ut2%2Fbanners%2Fall%2F260%2F2272x640.jpg

https%3A%2F%2Fcomplexbar.ru%2Fimages%2Fabt__ut2%2Fbanners%2Fall%2F260%2F2272x640.jpg

2175 ms

delivery_icon.svg

delivery_icon.svg

560 ms

logo_8qcc-co.png

logo_8qcc-co.png

557 ms

arrow.svg

arrow.svg

559 ms

fire.svg

fire.svg

556 ms

in_check_icon.svg

in_check_icon.svg

560 ms

Montserrat-Regular.woff

Montserrat-Regular.woff

1240 ms

Montserrat-Medium.woff

Montserrat-Medium.woff

736 ms

Montserrat-Light.woff

Montserrat-Light.woff

1241 ms

Montserrat-SemiBold.woff

Montserrat-SemiBold.woff

1677 ms

Montserrat-Bold.woff

Montserrat-Bold.woff

327 ms

flame.woff

flame.woff

328 ms

tag.js

tag.js

1639 ms

init.js

init.js

1634 ms

js

js

453 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

442 ms

Accessibility Review

complexbar.ru accessibility score

60

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

complexbar.ru best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

complexbar.ru SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Complexbar.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Complexbar.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

complexbar.ru

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Complexbar. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: