Tools & Wizards About Us
contree.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

contree.net

Belote contrée : Règlement et technique de ce jeu de cartes

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

503 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

131 ms

contree.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to contree.net homepage info - get ready to check Contree best content right away, or after learning these important things about contree.net

Comment jouer la contrée, découvrez cette belote bien particulière qui s\'apparente parfois même à la coinche ou à d\'autres versions du jeu

Visit contree.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Contree.net page load time and found that the first response time was 503 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

contree.net performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

33/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.2 s

60/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.5 s

71/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.contree.net

503 ms

style.css

146 ms

styles.css

410 ms

jquery.js

534 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

461 ms

Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Contree.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (582 ms) belongs to the original domain Contree.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 273.1 kB (70%)

Content Size

389.3 kB

After Optimization

116.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Contree.net main page is 389.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 349.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 15.9 kB

  • Original 20.8 kB
  • After minification 20.5 kB
  • After compression 4.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.9 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 67 B

  • Original 2.4 kB
  • After minification 2.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Contree images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 245.1 kB

  • Original 349.9 kB
  • After minification 349.6 kB
  • After compression 104.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 245.1 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 12.0 kB

  • Original 16.2 kB
  • After minification 11.7 kB
  • After compression 4.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Contree.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.0 kB or 74% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (88%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Contree. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.contree.net

www.contree.net

503 ms

style.css

style.css

146 ms

styles.css

styles.css

410 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

534 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

461 ms

jquery-1.4.2.min.js

jquery-1.4.2.min.js

464 ms

cufon-yui.js

cufon-yui.js

222 ms

Yanone_Kaffeesatz_Regular_400.font.js

Yanone_Kaffeesatz_Regular_400.font.js

446 ms

comments.css

comments.css

257 ms

reset.css

reset.css

419 ms

slide.css

slide.css

420 ms

featuredcats.css

featuredcats.css

435 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

218 ms

header.gif

header.gif

133 ms

top.png

top.png

134 ms

top-shadow.png

top-shadow.png

194 ms

shadow.png

shadow.png

195 ms

post-top.png

post-top.png

280 ms

post-bg.png

post-bg.png

265 ms

post-bot.png

post-bot.png

291 ms

widget-top.png

widget-top.png

340 ms

widget-bg.png

widget-bg.png

416 ms

widget-bot.png

widget-bot.png

417 ms

piwik.php

piwik.php

582 ms

piwik.php

piwik.php

428 ms

Accessibility Review

contree.net accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

contree.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

contree.net SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Contree.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Contree.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

contree.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Contree. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: