Tools & Wizards About Us
copypeer.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 61

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 61

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 27% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

copypeer.com

Web Content Writing and SEO Writing Service - CopyPeer

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

646 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

317 ms

copypeer.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to copypeer.com homepage info - get ready to check Copy Peer best content right away, or after learning these important things about copypeer.com

<div> <p>Hire qualified copywriters and article writers from our web content writing and SEO writing service. Buy blog articles and all forms of website content to help with your content marketing nee...

Visit copypeer.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Copypeer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 646 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

copypeer.com performance score

61

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

54/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

13/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

85/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value250 ms

84/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.054

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.3 s

39/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

copypeer.com

646 ms

index.php

67 ms

index.php

76 ms

index.php

109 ms

index.php

176 ms

Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Copypeer.com, 20% (14 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 12% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (646 ms) belongs to the original domain Copypeer.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 219.8 kB (38%)

Content Size

585.2 kB

After Optimization

365.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Copypeer.com main page is 585.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 347.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 52.7 kB

  • Original 67.3 kB
  • After minification 61.0 kB
  • After compression 14.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.7 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 81.9 kB

  • Original 163.1 kB
  • After minification 81.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Copy Peer needs image optimization as it can save up to 81.9 kB or 50% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 83.9 kB

  • Original 347.4 kB
  • After minification 347.4 kB
  • After compression 263.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 83.9 kB or 24% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 7.5 kB
  • After minification 7.5 kB
  • After compression 6.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Copypeer.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.3 kB or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (53%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

28

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Copy Peer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

copypeer.com

copypeer.com

646 ms

index.php

index.php

67 ms

index.php

index.php

76 ms

index.php

index.php

109 ms

index.php

index.php

176 ms

index.php

index.php

114 ms

mobile.css

mobile.css

80 ms

css

css

34 ms

innovaeditor.js

innovaeditor.js

93 ms

jquery.tinycarousel.js

jquery.tinycarousel.js

97 ms

nlslightbox.js

nlslightbox.js

29 ms

nlsanimation.js

nlsanimation.js

24 ms

nlslightbox.css

nlslightbox.css

26 ms

dialog.js

dialog.js

27 ms

istoolbar.css

istoolbar.css

25 ms

istoolbar.js

istoolbar.js

32 ms

editor.js

editor.js

71 ms

editor_lang.js

editor_lang.js

28 ms

1et9fu6s5

1et9fu6s5

194 ms

default

default

302 ms

logoblackpng_59

logoblackpng_59

74 ms

place-order-now.png

place-order-now.png

73 ms

error-icn.png

error-icn.png

73 ms

file-icon.png

file-icon.png

73 ms

pen-icn.png

pen-icn.png

73 ms

author-icn.png

author-icn.png

73 ms

star-icn.png

star-icn.png

127 ms

writer-ordering-process.gif

writer-ordering-process.gif

194 ms

100

100

126 ms

100

100

132 ms

100

100

133 ms

100

100

133 ms

100

100

133 ms

100

100

133 ms

customer-icon.png

customer-icon.png

191 ms

writer-icon.png

writer-icon.png

190 ms

3472

3472

192 ms

3547

3547

192 ms

3474

3474

198 ms

thingstodoafterpublishinganewblogpostjpg

thingstodoafterpublishinganewblogpostjpg

233 ms

medium

medium

258 ms

seopng

seopng

619 ms

logogreenmainpng_68

logogreenmainpng_68

620 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

71 ms

bg-bnr.png

bg-bnr.png

191 ms

star-rating.png

star-rating.png

188 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

95 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

110 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

114 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

114 ms

ionicons.ttf

ionicons.ttf

161 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWV4exQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWV4exQ.ttf

80 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWV4exQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWV4exQ.ttf

79 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWV4exQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWV4exQ.ttf

78 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWV4exQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWV4exQ.ttf

79 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

25 ms

twk-arr-find-polyfill.js

twk-arr-find-polyfill.js

55 ms

twk-object-values-polyfill.js

twk-object-values-polyfill.js

68 ms

twk-event-polyfill.js

twk-event-polyfill.js

62 ms

twk-entries-polyfill.js

twk-entries-polyfill.js

87 ms

twk-iterator-polyfill.js

twk-iterator-polyfill.js

62 ms

twk-promise-polyfill.js

twk-promise-polyfill.js

65 ms

twk-main.js

twk-main.js

65 ms

twk-vendor.js

twk-vendor.js

71 ms

twk-chunk-vendors.js

twk-chunk-vendors.js

77 ms

twk-chunk-common.js

twk-chunk-common.js

84 ms

twk-runtime.js

twk-runtime.js

85 ms

twk-app.js

twk-app.js

83 ms

get_unread_ticket_count

get_unread_ticket_count

33 ms

Accessibility Review

copypeer.com accessibility score

61

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

copypeer.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

copypeer.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Copypeer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Copypeer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

copypeer.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Copy Peer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: