6.7 sec in total
168 ms
6.3 sec
251 ms
Visit core-mission.org now to see the best up-to-date Core Mission content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about core-mission.org
Getting better all the time.
Visit core-mission.orgWe analyzed Core-mission.org page load time and found that the first response time was 168 ms and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
core-mission.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.4 s
0/100
10%
Value12.2 s
0/100
25%
Value22.1 s
0/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.34
33/100
15%
Value11.9 s
17/100
10%
168 ms
2257 ms
281 ms
272 ms
267 ms
Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Core-mission.org, 12% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Core-mission.org.
Page size can be reduced by 107.9 kB (20%)
542.7 kB
434.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Core-mission.org main page is 542.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 297.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 69.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.5 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Core Mission images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 10.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Core-mission.org has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (70%)
27
8
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Core Mission. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
core-mission.org
168 ms
www.core-mission.org
2257 ms
style.min.css
281 ms
styles.css
272 ms
link-juice-keeper-public.css
267 ms
font-awesome.min.css
38 ms
css
40 ms
blocks.css
317 ms
style.css
343 ms
jquery.min.js
223 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
552 ms
link-juice-keeper-public.js
588 ms
ssba.css
569 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
568 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
593 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
628 ms
index.js
690 ms
ssba.js
627 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
770 ms
navigation.js
654 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
839 ms
packery.pkgd.js
950 ms
custom.js
720 ms
cropped-Core-Mission.png
336 ms
Driver-Lalamove.jpg
393 ms
Paket-asuransi-kesehatan-mana-yang-harus-saya-pilih.jpg
609 ms
images.png
336 ms
download.jpg
427 ms
hospital.jpg
704 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf
61 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf
66 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDZbtY.ttf
76 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKeiunDZbtY.ttf
87 ms
ssbp.woff
382 ms
core-mission.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
core-mission.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
core-mission.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ID
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Core-mission.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Core-mission.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
core-mission.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Core Mission. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: