1.8 sec in total
92 ms
1.2 sec
502 ms
Visit coregenie.com now to see the best up-to-date Coregenie content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about coregenie.com
Best Web Design Malappuram. Cheap Web Design Company in Malappuram, Kottakkal,We are the #1 Web Design Company in Malappuram. We provide top quality Web Design and Website at affordable prices. Kerala...
Visit coregenie.comWe analyzed Coregenie.com page load time and found that the first response time was 92 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
coregenie.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
44/100
10%
Value11.3 s
0/100
25%
Value6.2 s
43/100
10%
Value800 ms
36/100
30%
Value0.021
100/100
15%
Value16.1 s
6/100
10%
92 ms
93 ms
33 ms
42 ms
30 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Coregenie.com, 13% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (877 ms) relates to the external source Coregeniesite.wpengine.com.
Page size can be reduced by 172.2 kB (11%)
1.5 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Coregenie.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 806.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 109.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 109.6 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 57.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Coregenie images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Coregenie.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (66%)
73
25
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Coregenie. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
coregenie.com
92 ms
flaticon.css
93 ms
style.min.css
33 ms
js_composer.min.css
42 ms
hbu-public-style.min.css
30 ms
intl-tel-input.min.css
27 ms
wpforms-full.css
37 ms
isotope.min.css
64 ms
enlighterjs.min.css
59 ms
css
64 ms
css
79 ms
linearicons-font.css
75 ms
flaticon.css
74 ms
bootstrap.css
65 ms
magnific-popup.css
78 ms
font-awesome.min.css
71 ms
owl.carousel.css
80 ms
owl.theme.default.min.css
88 ms
main.css
81 ms
normal-menu.css
78 ms
base.css
89 ms
style.css
93 ms
responsive.css
93 ms
jquery.min.js
111 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
109 ms
js
90 ms
email-decode.min.js
90 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
163 ms
enlighterjs.min.js
164 ms
comment-reply.min.js
183 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
185 ms
modernizr.js
184 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
185 ms
bootstrap.min.js
184 ms
jquery.counterup.min.js
604 ms
waypoints.min.js
185 ms
api.js
59 ms
parallax.min.js
185 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
172 ms
effect.min.js
575 ms
script.js
576 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
571 ms
jquery.intl-tel-input.min.js
572 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
545 ms
jquery.inputmask.bundle.min.js
547 ms
mailcheck.min.js
547 ms
wpforms.js
546 ms
fbevents.js
535 ms
launcher.js
663 ms
cg0hero.gif
877 ms
success-number-img-1.jpg
818 ms
LOGO-COREGENIE.png
502 ms
onetwo-tree-client-logo.png
501 ms
visual-solution-logo.png
502 ms
client-logo-5.png
502 ms
cyber-chanakya-client.png
502 ms
client-logo-2.png
501 ms
classy-client-logo.png
584 ms
client-logo-7.png
680 ms
loading.gif
584 ms
browser-1.png
585 ms
browser2-1.png
585 ms
browser3-1.png
621 ms
google-logo.png
627 ms
facebook-logo.png
627 ms
yelp-logo.png
625 ms
Developers_India_2019-360x260.png
679 ms
Microsoft-Dynamics-360x260.png
701 ms
neINzCKvrIcn5pbuuuriV9tTQJLVqVkcrSs.ttf
662 ms
neIQzCKvrIcn5pbuuuriV9tTSDn3uXQ-pQGIyY0.ttf
732 ms
neIQzCKvrIcn5pbuuuriV9tTSE3xuXQ-pQGIyY0.ttf
761 ms
neIQzCKvrIcn5pbuuuriV9tTSCnwuXQ-pQGIyY0.ttf
761 ms
Divi-Theme-Wordpress-360x260.png
684 ms
recaptcha__en.js
228 ms
va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnSKzeRhf_Xl7Glw.ttf
279 ms
va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnLK3eRhf_Xl7Glw.ttf
280 ms
va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnMK7eRhf_Xl7Glw.ttf
281 ms
va9E4kDNxMZdWfMOD5Vvl4jOazX3dA.ttf
251 ms
va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnPKreRhf_Xl7Glw.ttf
280 ms
linearicons.ttf
315 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
314 ms
5b17a7d95ae16be94959173a
197 ms
fallback
40 ms
fallback__ltr.css
24 ms
css
28 ms
logo_48.png
5 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf
7 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
7 ms
coregenie.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
coregenie.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
coregenie.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Coregenie.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Coregenie.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
coregenie.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Coregenie. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: