2.5 sec in total
45 ms
1.9 sec
596 ms
Welcome to coretalk.com homepage info - get ready to check Coretalk best content right away, or after learning these important things about coretalk.com
Visit coretalk.comWe analyzed Coretalk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 45 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
coretalk.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value5.3 s
21/100
25%
Value6.5 s
39/100
10%
Value480 ms
60/100
30%
Value0.02
100/100
15%
Value12.0 s
16/100
10%
45 ms
233 ms
152 ms
330 ms
29 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Coretalk.com, 69% (27 requests) were made to Lkq-ht.com and 15% (6 requests) were made to Lkq-ht-media.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (826 ms) relates to the external source Lkq-ht-media.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com.
Page size can be reduced by 308.3 kB (16%)
1.9 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Coretalk.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.8 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.4 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 154.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Coretalk images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 100.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 100.6 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Coretalk.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (53%)
30
14
The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Coretalk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
coretalk.com
45 ms
lkqheavytruck.com
233 ms
lkq-ht.com
152 ms
lkq-ht.com
330 ms
OtAutoBlock.js
29 ms
otSDKStub.js
38 ms
app.bd448d04.css
115 ms
runtime.5332280c.js
174 ms
190.2495b603.js
356 ms
629.c0782720.js
188 ms
navbar.9a533eab.js
188 ms
app.bceb7a5b.js
190 ms
js
76 ms
js
114 ms
engines.png
627 ms
hoods.png
470 ms
cooling.png
538 ms
transmissions.png
826 ms
core2.jpg
577 ms
core1.jpg
649 ms
burger.4a7a7007.svg
93 ms
lkqHT-logo.dedae4b5.svg
96 ms
phone_solid.f42502b0.svg
95 ms
decor-left-top-hero.a72e3c4c.svg
97 ms
decor-right-bottom-hero.366c7418.svg
97 ms
truck_hero.e1a08a85.png
318 ms
link-arrow.2d48260d.svg
153 ms
decor-left-top-truck.47f58c75.svg
153 ms
truck_blue.5d2b6bb1.png
405 ms
decor-left-top.8cfe7d4b.svg
151 ms
arrow_top_primary.c68012d6.svg
207 ms
fb.6a90db0d.svg
214 ms
x.ce586ef9.svg
216 ms
linkedin.659daebd.svg
216 ms
youtube.c9e37922.svg
264 ms
instagram.5ac77661.svg
277 ms
campton-book.0cf9c2cc.otf
243 ms
campton-semibold.0e9ca921.otf
310 ms
SharpGroteskMedium-22.895d648f.otf
284 ms
coretalk.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
coretalk.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
coretalk.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Coretalk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Coretalk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
coretalk.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Coretalk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: