Tools & Wizards About Us
costkill.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 61

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

costkill.com

costkill.com

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

426 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

863 ms

costkill.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to costkill.com homepage info - get ready to check Costkill best content right away, or after learning these important things about costkill.com

The rare domain name CostKill.com is now available for purchase, lease or rent for your next Cost Kill project. The perfect name for your marketing and advertising campaigns.

Visit costkill.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Costkill.com page load time and found that the first response time was 426 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

costkill.com performance score

61

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

90/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

50/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value990 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.2 s

74/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

costkill.com

426 ms

costkill.com

995 ms

bootstrap-custom.min.css

149 ms

parking2.min.css

273 ms

load

957 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Costkill.com, 30% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Serve.targetednetworks.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (995 ms) belongs to the original domain Costkill.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 11.0 kB (7%)

Content Size

156.9 kB

After Optimization

146.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Costkill.com main page is 156.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 105.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 5.6 kB

  • Original 7.5 kB
  • After minification 5.9 kB
  • After compression 2.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.6 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.6 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 244 B

  • Original 105.8 kB
  • After minification 105.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Costkill images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression.

CSS Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 5.1 kB

  • Original 43.6 kB
  • After minification 43.6 kB
  • After compression 38.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Costkill.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.1 kB or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (27%)

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Costkill. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

costkill.com

costkill.com

426 ms

costkill.com

costkill.com

995 ms

bootstrap-custom.min.css

bootstrap-custom.min.css

149 ms

parking2.min.css

parking2.min.css

273 ms

load

load

957 ms

style.css

style.css

346 ms

jquery-3.3.1.slim.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.slim.min.js

234 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

318 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

306 ms

main.js

main.js

308 ms

a9.jpg

a9.jpg

988 ms

epik-domain-names-dark.svg

epik-domain-names-dark.svg

303 ms

logo.png

logo.png

306 ms

bgi.png

bgi.png

919 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

92 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

240 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff

196 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff

194 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

176 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff

124 ms

Accessibility Review

costkill.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

costkill.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

costkill.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Costkill.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Costkill.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

costkill.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Costkill. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: