Tools & Wizards About Us
cotonblossom.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

cotonblossom.org

Cotton Blossom Sustainability is at the heart of our business.

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

668 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

454 ms

cotonblossom.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to cotonblossom.org homepage info - get ready to check Coton Blossom best content right away, or after learning these important things about cotonblossom.org

Cotton Blossom grew out of a 24 machine startup in 1997.We are a family owned, first generation business that started as a dream to create clothes that look and feel good without compromising on the p...

Visit cotonblossom.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Cotonblossom.org page load time and found that the first response time was 668 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cotonblossom.org performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value22.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.2 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value360 ms

72/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.018

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.1 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cotonblossom.org

668 ms

jquery-2.2.0.min.js

29 ms

slick.js

53 ms

bootstrap.min.js

77 ms

bootstrap.min.css

99 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Cotonblossom.org, 11% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (668 ms) belongs to the original domain Cotonblossom.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 262.2 kB (4%)

Content Size

6.1 MB

After Optimization

5.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cotonblossom.org main page is 6.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 23.4 kB

  • Original 28.8 kB
  • After minification 25.0 kB
  • After compression 5.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.8 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 182.7 kB

  • Original 5.9 MB
  • After minification 5.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Coton Blossom images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 23.3 kB

  • Original 44.5 kB
  • After minification 44.5 kB
  • After compression 21.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 23.3 kB or 52% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 32.8 kB

  • Original 88.3 kB
  • After minification 88.3 kB
  • After compression 55.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cotonblossom.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 32.8 kB or 37% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (48%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

26

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Coton Blossom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cotonblossom.org

cotonblossom.org

668 ms

jquery-2.2.0.min.js

jquery-2.2.0.min.js

29 ms

slick.js

slick.js

53 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

77 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

99 ms

docs.theme.min.css

docs.theme.min.css

167 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

131 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

134 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

159 ms

js

js

80 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

162 ms

style.css

style.css

160 ms

nav.css

nav.css

154 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

157 ms

css

css

38 ms

css

css

44 ms

css

css

75 ms

css

css

74 ms

responsiveslides.min.js

responsiveslides.min.js

208 ms

numscroller-1.0.js

numscroller-1.0.js

208 ms

jquery.flexisel.js

jquery.flexisel.js

208 ms

move-top.js

move-top.js

208 ms

easing.js

easing.js

209 ms

classie.js

classie.js

211 ms

nav.js

nav.js

211 ms

main.js

main.js

212 ms

SmoothScroll.min.js

SmoothScroll.min.js

211 ms

banner2.jpg

banner2.jpg

131 ms

knowmore.png

knowmore.png

108 ms

knowmore_grey.png

knowmore_grey.png

108 ms

abbg.jpg

abbg.jpg

134 ms

logo1.png

logo1.png

109 ms

ic1.png

ic1.png

108 ms

ic2.png

ic2.png

108 ms

ic3.png

ic3.png

108 ms

business_home_shadow.png

business_home_shadow.png

156 ms

home_sustain_shadow.png

home_sustain_shadow.png

132 ms

infra_home_shadow.png

infra_home_shadow.png

156 ms

w1.png

w1.png

112 ms

w2.png

w2.png

154 ms

w3.png

w3.png

155 ms

w4.png

w4.png

157 ms

w5.png

w5.png

156 ms

w6.png

w6.png

157 ms

w7.png

w7.png

158 ms

mentegoz.png

mentegoz.png

159 ms

move-up.png

move-up.png

149 ms

banner1.jpg

banner1.jpg

73 ms

banner3.jpg

banner3.jpg

75 ms

banner5.jpg

banner5.jpg

88 ms

banner4.jpg

banner4.jpg

76 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

11 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

26 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

27 ms

PN_xRfK9oXHga0XdZsg6.ttf

PN_xRfK9oXHga0XdZsg6.ttf

27 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

27 ms

8vIU7ww63mVu7gtR-kwKxNvkNOjw-tbnfY3lCA.ttf

8vIU7ww63mVu7gtR-kwKxNvkNOjw-tbnfY3lCA.ttf

28 ms

Accessibility Review

cotonblossom.org accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

cotonblossom.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

cotonblossom.org SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    ZX

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cotonblossom.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cotonblossom.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cotonblossom.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Coton Blossom. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: