4.9 sec in total
189 ms
4.2 sec
539 ms
Click here to check amazing Cottage Children S Center content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cottagechildrenscenter.com
Visit cottagechildrenscenter.comWe analyzed Cottagechildrenscenter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 189 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
cottagechildrenscenter.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
7/100
10%
Value12.7 s
0/100
25%
Value9.9 s
10/100
10%
Value1,320 ms
17/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value12.4 s
15/100
10%
189 ms
241 ms
228 ms
30 ms
231 ms
Our browser made a total of 162 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (143 requests) were addressed to the original Cottagechildrenscenter.com, 9% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Cottagechildrenscenter.com.
Page size can be reduced by 174.5 kB (7%)
2.5 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Cottagechildrenscenter.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 86.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 86.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 54.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cottage Children S Center images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 17.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 16.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cottagechildrenscenter.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 123 (86%)
143
20
The browser has sent 143 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cottage Children S Center. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 101 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cottagechildrenscenter.com
189 ms
cottagechildrenscenter.com
241 ms
layerslider.css
228 ms
style.min.css
30 ms
rs6.css
231 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
234 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
229 ms
style.css
54 ms
font-awesome.min.css
70 ms
style.min.css
86 ms
style.css
287 ms
dripicons.css
121 ms
kiko-all.css
134 ms
font-awesome-5.min.css
154 ms
stylesheet.min.css
169 ms
print.css
223 ms
style_dynamic.css
387 ms
responsive.min.css
414 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.css
445 ms
js_composer.min.css
484 ms
css
42 ms
core-dashboard.min.css
429 ms
style.css
295 ms
jquery.min.js
466 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
589 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
585 ms
layerslider.utils.js
447 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
663 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
655 ms
rbtools.min.js
481 ms
rs6.min.js
713 ms
css
51 ms
dashicons.min.css
667 ms
core.min.js
798 ms
accordion.min.js
603 ms
menu.min.js
811 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
665 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
862 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
682 ms
js
68 ms
dom-ready.min.js
720 ms
hooks.min.js
672 ms
i18n.min.js
835 ms
a11y.min.js
828 ms
autocomplete.min.js
843 ms
controlgroup.min.js
884 ms
checkboxradio.min.js
888 ms
button.min.js
922 ms
datepicker.min.js
873 ms
mouse.min.js
882 ms
resizable.min.js
917 ms
draggable.min.js
790 ms
dialog.min.js
810 ms
droppable.min.js
814 ms
progressbar.min.js
937 ms
style.css
985 ms
selectable.min.js
893 ms
sortable.min.js
683 ms
slider.min.js
951 ms
spinner.min.js
935 ms
tooltip.min.js
934 ms
tabs.min.js
773 ms
effect.min.js
769 ms
effect-blind.min.js
756 ms
effect-bounce.min.js
693 ms
effect-clip.min.js
1002 ms
effect-drop.min.js
916 ms
effect-explode.min.js
838 ms
effect-fade.min.js
857 ms
effect-fold.min.js
924 ms
effect-highlight.min.js
951 ms
effect-pulsate.min.js
834 ms
effect-size.min.js
966 ms
effect-scale.min.js
1033 ms
effect-shake.min.js
1020 ms
effect-slide.min.js
1021 ms
effect-transfer.min.js
1009 ms
doubletaptogo.js
938 ms
modernizr.min.js
852 ms
jquery.appear.js
1031 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
1026 ms
counter.js
764 ms
easypiechart.js
955 ms
mixitup.js
990 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
887 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
964 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
963 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
1026 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
1088 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
871 ms
infinitescroll.min.js
897 ms
jquery.waitforimages.js
801 ms
jquery.form.min.js
954 ms
waypoints.min.js
784 ms
jplayer.min.js
980 ms
bootstrap.carousel.js
1002 ms
skrollr.js
901 ms
Chart.min.js
966 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
996 ms
abstractBaseClass.js
1010 ms
img1-1.jpg
173 ms
jquery.countdown.js
809 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
90 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf
153 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf
164 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
186 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf
186 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K5fQBi8Jow.ttf
185 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K67QBi8Jow.ttf
185 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K8nQBi8Jow.ttf
162 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K-DQBi8Jow.ttf
186 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K3vXBi8Jow.ttf
186 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K0nXBi8Jow.ttf
188 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32KxfXBi8Jow.ttf
186 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K8nXBi8Jow.ttf
187 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K0nWBi8Jow.ttf
187 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
115 ms
jquery.multiscroll.min.js
943 ms
jquery.justifiedGallery.min.js
911 ms
bigtext.js
774 ms
jquery.sticky-kit.min.js
954 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
776 ms
typed.js
784 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.min.js
946 ms
lemmon-slider.min.js
917 ms
jquery.fullPage.min.js
856 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
693 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
876 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
882 ms
packery-mode.pkgd.min.js
793 ms
jquery.stretch.js
947 ms
imagesloaded.js
869 ms
rangeslider.min.js
844 ms
jquery.event.move.js
847 ms
jquery.twentytwenty.js
850 ms
swiper.min.js
867 ms
TweenLite.min.js
854 ms
smoothPageScroll.min.js
987 ms
default_dynamic.js
829 ms
default.min.js
994 ms
comment-reply.min.js
954 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
826 ms
qode-like.min.js
1039 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1081 ms
main-logo-V2.png
674 ms
main-logo-white.png
1006 ms
logo_black.png
985 ms
SliderHome.jpg
1108 ms
bee.png
985 ms
family-2-150x150.png
976 ms
blocks2-150x150.png
1002 ms
pencils2-150x150.png
931 ms
Icon_color-400x400.png
1005 ms
check-b.png
1058 ms
check-r.png
1081 ms
check-g.png
899 ms
CC4.jpg
1031 ms
CC2.jpg
1069 ms
CC1.jpg
1180 ms
CC3.jpg
1181 ms
Ver_color_light-834x1024.png
1083 ms
clouds-back.png
987 ms
cottagechildrenscenter.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
cottagechildrenscenter.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
cottagechildrenscenter.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cottagechildrenscenter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cottagechildrenscenter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cottagechildrenscenter.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cottage Children S Center. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: