Tools & Wizards About Us
creation.technology screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

creation.technology

Salesforce Education Cloud Consultants - SI & ISV Partners

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

72 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

56 ms

creation.technology screenshot

About Website

Visit creation.technology now to see the best up-to-date Creation content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about creation.technology

Creation Technology is a leading Salesforce Consultancy & Product Development company that speclises in Salesforce Education Cloud for Higher Education.

Visit creation.technology

Key Findings

We analyzed Creation.technology page load time and found that the first response time was 72 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

creation.technology performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

62/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

31/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

55/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value700 ms

42/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.3 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.creation.technology

72 ms

minified.js

35 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

34 ms

polyfill.min.js

1117 ms

thunderbolt-commons.2ae1974e.bundle.min.js

51 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Creation.technology, 45% (25 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 24% (13 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 769.1 kB (50%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

764.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Creation.technology main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 867.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 702.2 kB

  • Original 867.9 kB
  • After minification 866.1 kB
  • After compression 165.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 702.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 63.2 kB

  • Original 386.5 kB
  • After minification 323.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Creation needs image optimization as it can save up to 63.2 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 279.5 kB
  • After minification 279.5 kB
  • After compression 275.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (27%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

30

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Creation. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.creation.technology

www.creation.technology

72 ms

minified.js

minified.js

35 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

34 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

1117 ms

thunderbolt-commons.2ae1974e.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.2ae1974e.bundle.min.js

51 ms

main.8ce05abc.bundle.min.js

main.8ce05abc.bundle.min.js

52 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

51 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

54 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

52 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

54 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

52 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

53 ms

creation-logo.png

creation-logo.png

183 ms

launched-logo%20(2).png

launched-logo%20(2).png

327 ms

logo-legal.png

logo-legal.png

341 ms

1acf70_0d607ddcf15a4d899dc011776f3ebcc8~mv2.png

1acf70_0d607ddcf15a4d899dc011776f3ebcc8~mv2.png

391 ms

jahaaz.png

jahaaz.png

393 ms

uni-of-east-anglia.png

uni-of-east-anglia.png

367 ms

Leedlogo.png

Leedlogo.png

402 ms

uni-of-ports.png

uni-of-ports.png

445 ms

liverpool.png

liverpool.png

516 ms

uni-ulyster.png

uni-ulyster.png

497 ms

man-logo.png

man-logo.png

510 ms

queen-marry.png

queen-marry.png

585 ms

uni-of-oxford.png

uni-of-oxford.png

587 ms

image%2067.png

image%2067.png

638 ms

list-bullet.png

list-bullet.png

631 ms

Sales-force-consultancy.png

Sales-force-consultancy.png

676 ms

outsourced-development.png

outsourced-development.png

664 ms

Salesforce-industries.png

Salesforce-industries.png

754 ms

non-profit-cloud.png

non-profit-cloud.png

730 ms

products-logo.png

products-logo.png

753 ms

products-launched.png

products-launched.png

776 ms

logo-digital.png

logo-digital.png

782 ms

creation-logo.png

creation-logo.png

864 ms

footIcon.png

footIcon.png

955 ms

Salesforce-Premium-Partner-Logo-1.png

Salesforce-Premium-Partner-Logo-1.png

922 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

86 ms

e56ecb6d-da41-4bd9-982d-2d295bec9ab0.woff

e56ecb6d-da41-4bd9-982d-2d295bec9ab0.woff

57 ms

114 ms

106 ms

106 ms

107 ms

103 ms

103 ms

142 ms

142 ms

137 ms

135 ms

141 ms

135 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

6 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

24 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

7 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

6 ms

Accessibility Review

creation.technology accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

creation.technology best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

creation.technology SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Creation.technology can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Creation.technology main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

creation.technology

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Creation. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: