Tools & Wizards About Us
cs-eco.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 10

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

cs-eco.com

名古屋の株式会社中エネ

Page Load Speed

7.5 sec in total

First Response

644 ms

Resources Loaded

5.7 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

cs-eco.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Cs Eco content for Japan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cs-eco.com

東海地区(愛知・岐阜・三重・静岡)に特化した、省エネ・エネルギーマネジメントシステムをご提供する企業です。無料省エネ診断も行っておりますのでお気軽にお申し付けください。

Visit cs-eco.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cs-eco.com page load time and found that the first response time was 644 ms and then it took 6.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cs-eco.com performance score

10

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value44.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.5 s

17/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,500 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.642

9/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.0 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cs-eco.com

644 ms

cs-eco.com

1004 ms

font-awesome.min.css

185 ms

base.css

368 ms

style.css

525 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Cs-eco.com, 10% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Cs-eco.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (22%)

Content Size

5.8 MB

After Optimization

4.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cs-eco.com main page is 5.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 31.3 kB

  • Original 42.1 kB
  • After minification 40.1 kB
  • After compression 10.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.3 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

  • Original 5.6 MB
  • After minification 4.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cs Eco needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 9.5 kB

  • Original 88.8 kB
  • After minification 88.8 kB
  • After compression 79.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 9.5 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 28.5 kB

  • Original 81.3 kB
  • After minification 77.1 kB
  • After compression 52.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cs-eco.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 28.5 kB or 35% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (56%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

26

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cs Eco. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cs-eco.com

cs-eco.com

644 ms

cs-eco.com

cs-eco.com

1004 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

185 ms

base.css

base.css

368 ms

style.css

style.css

525 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

721 ms

styles.css

styles.css

548 ms

cf7msm.css

cf7msm.css

577 ms

style.css

style.css

772 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

781 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

698 ms

js

js

78 ms

style.css

style.css

729 ms

notosansjapanese.css

notosansjapanese.css

41 ms

script.js

script.js

769 ms

script-front.js

script-front.js

872 ms

jquery.meanmenu.js

jquery.meanmenu.js

898 ms

platform.js

platform.js

34 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

910 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

959 ms

index.js

index.js

962 ms

index.js

index.js

973 ms

cf7msm.min.js

cf7msm.min.js

1044 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

1076 ms

app.js

app.js

1090 ms

jquery.pagetop.js

jquery.pagetop.js

1288 ms

setup.css

setup.css

368 ms

common.css

common.css

381 ms

base.css

base.css

433 ms

meanmenu.css

meanmenu.css

470 ms

contents.css

contents.css

486 ms

contents-02.css

contents-02.css

562 ms

form.css

form.css

577 ms

slick.css

slick.css

607 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

650 ms

blueberry.css

blueberry.css

668 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

142 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

187 ms

main_visual.png

main_visual.png

2552 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

397 ms

tel.gif

tel.gif

396 ms

sp_img_mv.jpg

sp_img_mv.jpg

397 ms

top_bar_01.jpg

top_bar_01.jpg

470 ms

top_bar_02.jpg

top_bar_02.jpg

499 ms

ico_h3.png

ico_h3.png

397 ms

h3_line.gif

h3_line.gif

395 ms

bg_ems_front.png

bg_ems_front.png

1278 ms

bg_ems.jpg

bg_ems.jpg

707 ms

h3m_line.png

h3m_line.png

472 ms

img_ems.jpg

img_ems.jpg

1020 ms

arrow_bl.png

arrow_bl.png

489 ms

cta_line.gif

cta_line.gif

508 ms

cta_tel.gif

cta_tel.gif

648 ms

btn_cta_tel.gif

btn_cta_tel.gif

671 ms

btn_cta_mail.gif

btn_cta_mail.gif

701 ms

img_service_01.jpg

img_service_01.jpg

1173 ms

img_service_02.jpg

img_service_02.jpg

1214 ms

bg_advantage.jpg

bg_advantage.jpg

1856 ms

%E3%82%BD%E3%83%BC%E3%83%A9%E3%83%BC%E3%82%B7%E3%82%A7%E3%82%A2%E3%83%AA%E3%83%B3%E3%82%B0-scaled-1-480x320.jpg

%E3%82%BD%E3%83%BC%E3%83%A9%E3%83%BC%E3%82%B7%E3%82%A7%E3%82%A2%E3%83%AA%E3%83%B3%E3%82%B0-scaled-1-480x320.jpg

902 ms

shutterstock_2009806667-480x320.jpg

shutterstock_2009806667-480x320.jpg

1098 ms

f_tel.png

f_tel.png

1199 ms

f_logo.gif

f_logo.gif

1293 ms

NotoSansJP-Regular.woff

NotoSansJP-Regular.woff

54 ms

NotoSansJP-Medium.woff

NotoSansJP-Medium.woff

107 ms

NotoSansJP-DemiLight.woff

NotoSansJP-DemiLight.woff

146 ms

NotoSansJP-Light.woff

NotoSansJP-Light.woff

147 ms

NotoSansJP-Thin.woff

NotoSansJP-Thin.woff

148 ms

NotoSansJP-Bold.woff

NotoSansJP-Bold.woff

149 ms

NotoSansJP-Black.woff

NotoSansJP-Black.woff

150 ms

sp_img_mv.jpg

sp_img_mv.jpg

1305 ms

top_bar_01.jpg

top_bar_01.jpg

913 ms

top_bar_02.jpg

top_bar_02.jpg

900 ms

Accessibility Review

cs-eco.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

cs-eco.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

cs-eco.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cs-eco.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cs-eco.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cs-eco.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cs Eco. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: