Tools & Wizards About Us
cuddair.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 68

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 74

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

cuddair.com

Cudd Heating & Air, INC. | Chester, SC HVAC Service & Installation

Page Load Speed

924 ms in total

First Response

48 ms

Resources Loaded

573 ms

Page Rendered

303 ms

cuddair.com screenshot

About Website

Visit cuddair.com now to see the best up-to-date Cudd Air content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cuddair.com

When it comes to your heating and air, trust the experts at Cudd. For over 30 years, we have proudly provided Chester, SC HVAC repair, financing, commercial HVAC, and installation. Our technicians are...

Visit cuddair.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cuddair.com page load time and found that the first response time was 48 ms and then it took 876 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cuddair.com performance score

68

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

92/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

21/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.157

74/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.9 s

65/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cuddair.com

48 ms

www.cuddair.com

127 ms

LogoLockup_onwhite_040320160317_lowres-362w.png

121 ms

jquery-3.7.0.min.js

54 ms

d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js

72 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Cuddair.com, 63% (10 requests) were made to Lirp.cdn-website.com and 25% (4 requests) were made to Static.cdn-website.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (395 ms) relates to the external source Lirp.cdn-website.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 796.3 kB (24%)

Content Size

3.4 MB

After Optimization

2.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Cuddair.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 91.9 kB

  • Original 117.4 kB
  • After minification 113.5 kB
  • After compression 25.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 91.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 704.2 kB

  • Original 3.1 MB
  • After minification 2.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cudd Air needs image optimization as it can save up to 704.2 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 195 B

  • Original 138.7 kB
  • After minification 138.7 kB
  • After compression 138.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cudd Air. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

cuddair.com

cuddair.com

48 ms

www.cuddair.com

www.cuddair.com

127 ms

LogoLockup_onwhite_040320160317_lowres-362w.png

LogoLockup_onwhite_040320160317_lowres-362w.png

121 ms

jquery-3.7.0.min.js

jquery-3.7.0.min.js

54 ms

d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js

d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js

72 ms

d-js-jquery-migrate.min.js

d-js-jquery-migrate.min.js

73 ms

text47-300w.png

text47-300w.png

96 ms

P1020986-b82a0690-1920w.JPG

P1020986-b82a0690-1920w.JPG

342 ms

istockphoto-1140391316-612x612-199w.jpg

istockphoto-1140391316-612x612-199w.jpg

109 ms

cudd-truck-412w.png

cudd-truck-412w.png

181 ms

d68f4b1d1b163652c320eb068d2b8275_google-reviews-2-1-1156-577-c-180w.png

d68f4b1d1b163652c320eb068d2b8275_google-reviews-2-1-1156-577-c-180w.png

101 ms

yelp-logo-22-174w.png

yelp-logo-22-174w.png

395 ms

facebook-review-button-1-216w.png

facebook-review-button-1-216w.png

156 ms

LogoLockup_onwhite_040320160317_lowres-299w.png

LogoLockup_onwhite_040320160317_lowres-299w.png

187 ms

logo-78a76a62-278w.png

logo-78a76a62-278w.png

247 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

4 ms

Accessibility Review

cuddair.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

cuddair.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

cuddair.com SEO score

74

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cuddair.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cuddair.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cuddair.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cudd Air. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: