Tools & Wizards About Us
currentstaffing.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

currentstaffing.com

Current Staffing Solutions - Current Staffing Solutions

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

136 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

720 ms

currentstaffing.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Current Staffing content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about currentstaffing.com

A new online experience is headed your way at Current Staffing. Please check back soon for a brand new interactive experience. Why Choose Us As a Disability Owned Business, you will find we are not yo...

Visit currentstaffing.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Currentstaffing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 136 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

currentstaffing.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

88/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

27/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

66/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value870 ms

33/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.033

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.7 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

currentstaffing.com

136 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

19 ms

style.min.css

30 ms

styles.css

11 ms

style.min.css

28 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Currentstaffing.com, 15% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 15% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (469 ms) relates to the external source Jnn-pa.googleapis.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 448.9 kB (38%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

737.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Currentstaffing.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 635.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 24.5 kB

  • Original 31.3 kB
  • After minification 29.4 kB
  • After compression 6.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.5 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 84.1 kB

  • Original 635.4 kB
  • After minification 551.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Current Staffing needs image optimization as it can save up to 84.1 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 25.3 kB

  • Original 125.8 kB
  • After minification 125.8 kB
  • After compression 100.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 25.3 kB or 20% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 315.0 kB

  • Original 393.5 kB
  • After minification 393.3 kB
  • After compression 78.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Currentstaffing.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 315.0 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (61%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Current Staffing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

currentstaffing.com

currentstaffing.com

136 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

19 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

30 ms

styles.css

styles.css

11 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

28 ms

css

css

33 ms

style.css

style.css

10 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

15 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

25 ms

content-shortcodes.css

content-shortcodes.css

24 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

24 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

25 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

27 ms

global.js

global.js

27 ms

other-shortcodes.js

other-shortcodes.js

27 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

176 ms

staffing-banner-1.jpg

staffing-banner-1.jpg

204 ms

BaKIc8Vby1A

BaKIc8Vby1A

239 ms

comingsoon.png

comingsoon.png

147 ms

wehaveitcovered.png

wehaveitcovered.png

153 ms

Fotolia_28025822_X-03.jpg

Fotolia_28025822_X-03.jpg

144 ms

Proffesional_150x400.png

Proffesional_150x400.png

145 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

146 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

148 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

42 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

44 ms

collect

collect

30 ms

collect

collect

43 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

30 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

91 ms

base.js

base.js

162 ms

fetch-polyfill.js

fetch-polyfill.js

89 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

128 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

332 ms

Y-zeT9jJ33tCNYTX0Kw8-3I-ogsAM9wZgys9W8554e8.js

Y-zeT9jJ33tCNYTX0Kw8-3I-ogsAM9wZgys9W8554e8.js

173 ms

embed.js

embed.js

84 ms

id

id

80 ms

Create

Create

469 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

392 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

398 ms

Accessibility Review

currentstaffing.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

currentstaffing.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

currentstaffing.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Currentstaffing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Currentstaffing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

currentstaffing.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Current Staffing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: