Tools & Wizards About Us
roofing-tech.constructiontechreview.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

roofing-tech.constructiontechreview.com

Construction Tech Review: Technology Magazine for Construction Tech Industry

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

130 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

157 ms

roofing-tech.constructiontechreview.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Roofing Tech Construction Review content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about roofing-tech.constructiontechreview.com

Construction Tech Review is a print and digital magazine that provides the latest news, leading organization decision makers' viewpoints, technology trends, and audience insider information from the C...

Visit roofing-tech.constructiontechreview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Roofing-tech.constructiontechreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 130 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

roofing-tech.constructiontechreview.com performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value810 ms

36/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.384

27/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.3 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

roofing-tech.constructiontechreview.com

130 ms

roofing-tech.constructiontechreview.com

414 ms

style1.css

256 ms

bootstrap.min.css

326 ms

font-awesome.min.css

263 ms

Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Roofing-tech.constructiontechreview.com, 61% (59 requests) were made to Constructiontechreview.com and 8% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (882 ms) relates to the external source Constructiontechreview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 401.0 kB (24%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Roofing-tech.constructiontechreview.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 792.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 59.0 kB

  • Original 77.4 kB
  • After minification 76.1 kB
  • After compression 18.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.0 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 16.4 kB

  • Original 521.6 kB
  • After minification 505.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Roofing Tech Construction Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 131.6 kB

  • Original 792.2 kB
  • After minification 778.5 kB
  • After compression 660.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 131.6 kB or 17% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 193.9 kB

  • Original 304.0 kB
  • After minification 282.0 kB
  • After compression 110.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Roofing-tech.constructiontechreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 193.9 kB or 64% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (63%)

Requests Now

82

After Optimization

30

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Roofing Tech Construction Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

roofing-tech.constructiontechreview.com

roofing-tech.constructiontechreview.com

130 ms

roofing-tech.constructiontechreview.com

roofing-tech.constructiontechreview.com

414 ms

style1.css

style1.css

256 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

326 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

263 ms

animate.css

animate.css

268 ms

hover-min.css

hover-min.css

281 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

284 ms

meanmenu.min.css

meanmenu.min.css

313 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

322 ms

lightbox.min.css

lightbox.min.css

334 ms

style.css

style.css

345 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

355 ms

style.css

style.css

375 ms

social_sharing.css

social_sharing.css

379 ms

site.css

site.css

382 ms

modernizr-2.8.3.min.js

modernizr-2.8.3.min.js

387 ms

css

css

56 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

165 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

128 ms

js

js

96 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

38 ms

element.js

element.js

83 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

581 ms

menu.css

menu.css

581 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

582 ms

main4906_v1.css

main4906_v1.css

666 ms

skins4906.css

skins4906.css

667 ms

new_region.css

new_region.css

667 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

39 ms

search.js

search.js

600 ms

jolly-menu.js

jolly-menu.js

600 ms

cio.js

cio.js

598 ms

css

css

28 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

40 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

702 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

703 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

701 ms

jquery.meanmenu.js

jquery.meanmenu.js

702 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

702 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

700 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.js

jquery.magnific-popup.js

816 ms

jquery.counterup.min.js

jquery.counterup.min.js

788 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

786 ms

lightbox.min.js

lightbox.min.js

815 ms

main.js

main.js

785 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

785 ms

custom.js

custom.js

654 ms

css

css

13 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

358 ms

atrk.js

atrk.js

242 ms

constr-logo-new.png

constr-logo-new.png

353 ms

x.png

x.png

693 ms

linkedin_cirr.png

linkedin_cirr.png

467 ms

Twitter_cir22.png

Twitter_cir22.png

436 ms

close.png

close.png

484 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

484 ms

prev.png

prev.png

693 ms

next.png

next.png

692 ms

constr-logo-new.png

constr-logo-new.png

710 ms

toggleIcon.png

toggleIcon.png

692 ms

load.gif

load.gif

691 ms

ji5birydft.jpg

ji5birydft.jpg

692 ms

450x308_6130.jpg

450x308_6130.jpg

870 ms

450x308_R3rN.jpg

450x308_R3rN.jpg

867 ms

450x308_6QF9.jpg

450x308_6QF9.jpg

867 ms

450x308_t19F.jpg

450x308_t19F.jpg

882 ms

360x247_9PCM.jpg

360x247_9PCM.jpg

881 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

482 ms

zrt_lookup_nohtml.html

zrt_lookup_nohtml.html

291 ms

pubads_impl.js

pubads_impl.js

141 ms

370x420_fv3C.jpg

370x420_fv3C.jpg

725 ms

370x420_5l6Y.jpg

370x420_5l6Y.jpg

731 ms

370x420_57t9.jpg

370x420_57t9.jpg

725 ms

370x420_AbRC.jpg

370x420_AbRC.jpg

646 ms

370x420_3uLm.jpg

370x420_3uLm.jpg

642 ms

370x420_pFJ6.jpg

370x420_pFJ6.jpg

643 ms

css

css

105 ms

ads

ads

261 ms

container.html

container.html

50 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

78 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

231 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

248 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

427 ms

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

467 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

266 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

265 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

265 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

266 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

266 ms

ads

ads

103 ms

10928727491998700153

10928727491998700153

66 ms

icon.png

icon.png

188 ms

abg_lite.js

abg_lite.js

155 ms

window_focus.js

window_focus.js

156 ms

ufs_web_display.js

ufs_web_display.js

66 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

65 ms

Accessibility Review

roofing-tech.constructiontechreview.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

roofing-tech.constructiontechreview.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

roofing-tech.constructiontechreview.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Roofing-tech.constructiontechreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Roofing-tech.constructiontechreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

roofing-tech.constructiontechreview.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Roofing Tech Construction Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: