Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

staging.cruisecritic.com

Cruise Reviews, Cruise Deals and Cruises - Cruise Critic

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

7 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

690 ms

staging.cruisecritic.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to staging.cruisecritic.com homepage info - get ready to check Staging Cruise Critic best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about staging.cruisecritic.com

Complete guide to cruises, cruise lines and exclusive cruise deals. Over 150,000+ cruise reviews, ship ratings and the largest cruise forum.

Visit staging.cruisecritic.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Staging.cruisecritic.com page load time and found that the first response time was 7 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

staging.cruisecritic.com performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

75/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

47/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.8 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,660 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.7 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

staging.cruisecritic.com

7 ms

staging.cruisecritic.com

518 ms

halifax-photo-maurizio-de-mattei-shutterstock_x400_41.jpg

292 ms

image_x400_41.jpg

345 ms

image_225x_43.jpg

277 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 34% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Staging.cruisecritic.com, 21% (16 requests) were made to Images.cruisecritic.com and 12% (9 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (518 ms) belongs to the original domain Staging.cruisecritic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 717.1 kB (35%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Staging.cruisecritic.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 882.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 668.1 kB

  • Original 882.3 kB
  • After minification 841.9 kB
  • After compression 214.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 668.1 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 610.9 kB
  • After minification 610.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Staging Cruise Critic images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 49.0 kB

  • Original 527.6 kB
  • After minification 527.3 kB
  • After compression 478.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (55%)

Requests Now

71

After Optimization

32

The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Staging Cruise Critic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

staging.cruisecritic.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

staging.cruisecritic.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

staging.cruisecritic.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Staging.cruisecritic.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Staging.cruisecritic.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Staging Cruise Critic. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: