Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    21% of websites

dampfline.com

STRATO - Domain not available

Page Load Speed

614 ms in total

First Response

256 ms

Resources Loaded

259 ms

Page Rendered

99 ms

dampfline.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to dampfline.com homepage info - get ready to check Dampfline best content right away, or after learning these important things about dampfline.com

Visit dampfline.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Dampfline.com page load time and found that the first response time was 256 ms and then it took 358 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

dampfline.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

dampfline.com

256 ms

Our browser made a total of 1 request to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Dampfline.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (256 ms) belongs to the original domain Dampfline.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 342.2 kB (6%)

Content Size

5.3 MB

After Optimization

5.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Dampfline.com main page is 5.3 MB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 4.7 kB
  • After minification 4.5 kB
  • After compression 1.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.7 kB or 58% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 334.9 kB

  • Original 5.2 MB
  • After minification 4.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dampfline images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 22.8 kB
  • After minification 20.1 kB
  • After compression 18.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 4.3 kB or 19% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 291 B

  • Original 86.6 kB
  • After minification 86.6 kB
  • After compression 86.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dampfline.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Accessibility Review

dampfline.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

dampfline.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

dampfline.com SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    SV

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dampfline.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Swedish is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Dampfline.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Dampfline. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: