3 sec in total
515 ms
2.1 sec
408 ms
Welcome to deceuninck.in homepage info - get ready to check Deceuninck best content right away, or after learning these important things about deceuninck.in
Discover top-notch uPVC Windows and Doors Solution in India. Trust Deceuninck for superior quality. Browse our range now.
Visit deceuninck.inWe analyzed Deceuninck.in page load time and found that the first response time was 515 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
deceuninck.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
11/100
10%
Value16.1 s
0/100
25%
Value14.7 s
1/100
10%
Value4,910 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value18.4 s
3/100
10%
515 ms
55 ms
70 ms
75 ms
63 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Deceuninck.in, 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (546 ms) belongs to the original domain Deceuninck.in.
Page size can be reduced by 127.6 kB (7%)
1.8 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Deceuninck.in main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 912.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 90.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.9 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 78 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Deceuninck images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 23.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 12.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Deceuninck.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (80%)
82
16
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Deceuninck. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.deceuninck.in
515 ms
css
55 ms
css
70 ms
css
75 ms
style.min.css
63 ms
foobox.free.min.css
116 ms
styles.css
159 ms
intlTelInput.min.css
159 ms
countrySelect.min.css
161 ms
settings.css
163 ms
wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css
161 ms
wppopups-base.css
168 ms
font-awesome.min.css
212 ms
owl.carousel.css
210 ms
bootstrap.css
213 ms
pikaday.css
216 ms
core.css
218 ms
components.css
223 ms
button.css
262 ms
swipebox.css
262 ms
style.css
265 ms
wordpress.css
266 ms
js_composer.min.css
278 ms
pum-site-styles.css
274 ms
style.css
314 ms
jquery-1.12.4-wp.js
321 ms
jquery-migrate-1.4.1-wp.js
319 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
331 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
346 ms
foobox.free.min.js
349 ms
js
137 ms
custom-styles.css
383 ms
js
214 ms
font-awesome.min.css
546 ms
flipbox-box.css
389 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
389 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
413 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
414 ms
hooks.min.js
450 ms
wppopups.js
450 ms
index.js
454 ms
api.js
57 ms
plugin-styles.css
453 ms
scc-c2.min.js
8 ms
index.js
399 ms
intlTelInput.min.js
378 ms
countrySelect.min.js
337 ms
wpcf7r-fe.js
353 ms
modernizr.js
351 ms
countto.js
348 ms
moment.min.js
421 ms
pikaday.js
417 ms
jquery.swipebox.js
382 ms
bootstrap.min.js
379 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
376 ms
doubletaptogo.js
394 ms
froogaloop2.min.js
390 ms
functions.js
391 ms
owl.carousel.js
357 ms
core.min.js
354 ms
position.min.js
385 ms
pum-site-scripts.js
396 ms
css
20 ms
scripts.js
405 ms
index.js
386 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
360 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
410 ms
skrollr.min.js
422 ms
gtm.js
107 ms
logo.png
364 ms
virtual-showroom.jpg
439 ms
home1.png
544 ms
115235_Flex_reference_The_Netherlands_cream_096_Low-300x200.jpg
365 ms
popup-1024x978.jpg
427 ms
home1box.jpg
357 ms
home3box.jpg
355 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K0nXBi8Jow.ttf
55 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K67QBi8Jow.ttf
64 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpcBO5Xk.ttf
75 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xk.ttf
75 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyXsosBO5Xk.ttf
76 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
411 ms
home2box.jpg
375 ms
home4box.jpg
372 ms
recaptcha__en.js
17 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
56 ms
revolution.extension.actions.min.js
73 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
73 ms
coloredbg.png
54 ms
loader.gif
53 ms
deceuninck.in accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
deceuninck.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
deceuninck.in SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Deceuninck.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Deceuninck.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
deceuninck.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Deceuninck. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: