Tools & Wizards About Us
demark.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 8

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

demark.com

DeMARK® Analytics - Unrivaled Financial Market Timing

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

206 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

525 ms

demark.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing DeMARK content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about demark.com

For nearly five decades, DeMARK® Analytics and the DeMARK Indicators® have been the premier name in financial market timing.

Visit demark.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Demark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 206 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

demark.com performance score

8

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.2 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,340 ms

17/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.677

0/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.1 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

demark.com

206 ms

demark.com

359 ms

styles.css

34 ms

style.css

48 ms

css

56 ms

Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Demark.com, 6% (6 requests) were made to Staging-demarkcom.kinsta.cloud and 5% (5 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (832 ms) relates to the external source Staging-demarkcom.kinsta.cloud.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 150.9 kB (7%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Demark.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 90.3 kB

  • Original 108.2 kB
  • After minification 102.4 kB
  • After compression 17.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 56.5 kB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. DeMARK images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 969 B

  • Original 209.2 kB
  • After minification 209.2 kB
  • After compression 208.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 3.3 kB
  • After minification 2.3 kB
  • After compression 267 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Demark.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.1 kB or 92% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (79%)

Requests Now

81

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of DeMARK. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 36 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

demark.com

demark.com

206 ms

demark.com

demark.com

359 ms

styles.css

styles.css

34 ms

style.css

style.css

48 ms

css

css

56 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

49 ms

iconsmind.css

iconsmind.css

66 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

58 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

71 ms

unit-testing.css

unit-testing.css

61 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

69 ms

header.css

header.css

75 ms

ytv.css

ytv.css

77 ms

icon

icon

54 ms

style.css

style.css

87 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

83 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

100 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

114 ms

post-10.css

post-10.css

108 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

119 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

114 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

130 ms

post-3399.css

post-3399.css

136 ms

post-834.css

post-834.css

140 ms

post-2763.css

post-2763.css

154 ms

post-2797.css

post-2797.css

137 ms

css

css

52 ms

css

css

52 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

156 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

158 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

168 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

177 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

187 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

189 ms

hco_fonts.css

hco_fonts.css

162 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

216 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

223 ms

slick.css

slick.css

228 ms

button.css

button.css

224 ms

hero.css

hero.css

228 ms

slider.css

slider.css

306 ms

index.js

index.js

226 ms

index.js

index.js

328 ms

api.js

api.js

52 ms

api.js

api.js

67 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

225 ms

parallax.min.js

parallax.min.js

266 ms

jquery.formstone.min.js

jquery.formstone.min.js

254 ms

main.js

main.js

253 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

244 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

279 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

271 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

267 ms

index.js

index.js

263 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

298 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

294 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

286 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

269 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

278 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

261 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

269 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

258 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

262 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

257 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

263 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

303 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

292 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

104 ms

pixels-12x12-6percent.png

pixels-12x12-6percent.png

433 ms

e2795695d3c347433fd619115458d4d0

e2795695d3c347433fd619115458d4d0

85 ms

pixels-12x12-25percent.png

pixels-12x12-25percent.png

654 ms

demark-logo.png

demark-logo.png

225 ms

Glasses-Guy-w-Indicators-web-3.jpg

Glasses-Guy-w-Indicators-web-3.jpg

227 ms

symbolik-dark-theme-iso-tall-2.png

symbolik-dark-theme-iso-tall-2.png

228 ms

dm-page-header-integrations-2.jpg

dm-page-header-integrations-2.jpg

229 ms

demark-indicators-combo-dji-1024x679.png

demark-indicators-combo-dji-1024x679.png

755 ms

27-inch-imac-2011-perspective-03-949x1024.png

27-inch-imac-2011-perspective-03-949x1024.png

239 ms

GothamSSm-Light_Web.woff

GothamSSm-Light_Web.woff

832 ms

GothamSSm-Book_Web.woff

GothamSSm-Book_Web.woff

794 ms

GothamSSm-Medium_Web.woff

GothamSSm-Medium_Web.woff

813 ms

GothamSSm-Bold_Web.woff

GothamSSm-Bold_Web.woff

782 ms

third-party-integrations-logos-5-1024x775.png

third-party-integrations-logos-5-1024x775.png

260 ms

DeMark-Thumbnail-300x169.png

DeMark-Thumbnail-300x169.png

261 ms

Screenshot-from-2022-07-06-16-21-50-300x145.png

Screenshot-from-2022-07-06-16-21-50-300x145.png

231 ms

Screenshot-from-2022-06-22-15-56-17-300x147.png

Screenshot-from-2022-06-22-15-56-17-300x147.png

247 ms

demark-logo-on-dark.png

demark-logo-on-dark.png

242 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

305 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

49 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

289 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

60 ms

font

font

59 ms

font

font

60 ms

font

font

61 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

47 ms

circular-regular.ttf

circular-regular.ttf

328 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

234 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

25 ms

Accessibility Review

demark.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

demark.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

demark.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Demark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Demark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

demark.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of DeMARK. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: