1.3 sec in total
72 ms
433 ms
827 ms
Welcome to desire.marketing homepage info - get ready to check Desire best content right away, or after learning these important things about desire.marketing
Let our dedicated and experienced team handle your SEO and link building campaign. Rest assured, you are in the right company!
Visit desire.marketingWe analyzed Desire.marketing page load time and found that the first response time was 72 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
desire.marketing performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.8 s
89/100
10%
Value2.1 s
96/100
25%
Value1.8 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value1.8 s
100/100
10%
72 ms
78 ms
13 ms
32 ms
27 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Desire.marketing, 91% (29 requests) were made to Desiremarketing.io and 3% (1 request) were made to Widget.clutch.co. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (180 ms) relates to the external source Widget.clutch.co.
Page size can be reduced by 438.3 kB (61%)
723.8 kB
285.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Desire.marketing main page is 723.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 439.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 367.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 367.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 70.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Desire needs image optimization as it can save up to 70.5 kB or 40% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 419 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 37 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Desire.marketing has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (57%)
30
13
The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Desire. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
desire.marketing
72 ms
desiremarketing.io
78 ms
938ae1ef783f.google-fonts.min.css
13 ms
style-global.css
32 ms
pmfastclick.min.js
27 ms
widget.js
180 ms
sticky.min.js
95 ms
offside.min.js
95 ms
app.js
95 ms
smooth-scroll.min.js
95 ms
menu.min.js
160 ms
modal.js
94 ms
lazyload.min.js
172 ms
pminstantpage.min.js
173 ms
popup.js
171 ms
accordion.js
173 ms
select2.full.min.js
172 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
173 ms
forminator-form.min.js
176 ms
front.multi.min.js
177 ms
api.js
174 ms
tabs.js
174 ms
cropped-Desire-Marketing.png
111 ms
memphis-colorful.png
101 ms
Backlinks-from-High-Traffic-and-Relavency-websites-compressed.jpg
114 ms
Slazzer.png
60 ms
NordVPN.png
70 ms
TestSigma.png
86 ms
VPNOverview-Logo.png
51 ms
SetApp_Logo.png
86 ms
cropped-Desire-Marketing-300x60.png
77 ms
Desire-Marketing-1-300x70.png
101 ms
desire.marketing accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
desire.marketing best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
desire.marketing SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Desire.marketing can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Desire.marketing main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
desire.marketing
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Desire. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: