1.7 sec in total
148 ms
1.3 sec
255 ms
Welcome to desire.marketing homepage info - get ready to check Desire best content right away, or after learning these important things about desire.marketing
Let our dedicated and experienced team handle your SEO and link building campaign. Rest assured, you are in the right company!
Visit desire.marketingWe analyzed Desire.marketing page load time and found that the first response time was 148 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
desire.marketing performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
87/100
10%
Value3.4 s
67/100
25%
Value2.4 s
98/100
10%
Value510 ms
57/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.9 s
88/100
10%
148 ms
93 ms
38 ms
31 ms
31 ms
Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Desire.marketing, 10% (3 requests) were made to Lh3.googleusercontent.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (412 ms) relates to the external source Lh3.googleusercontent.com.
Page size can be reduced by 659.0 kB (36%)
1.8 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Desire.marketing main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 165.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 165.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 493.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Desire needs image optimization as it can save up to 493.1 kB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 12 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
We found no issues to fix!
30
30
The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Desire. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
desire.marketing
148 ms
js
93 ms
services-1-150x150.webp
38 ms
loader.js
31 ms
Norstrat-150x150.png
31 ms
about-1-150x150.webp
50 ms
services-2-1-150x150.webp
89 ms
Technical-SEO-for-SaaS.png
174 ms
SEO-Tools-for-small-businesses.png
228 ms
SaaS-Content-Writing-300x157.png
139 ms
Launch-a-SaaS-Product-300x157.png
139 ms
Add-a-heading-62-300x158.png
89 ms
ALV-UjVCbqENL_N3FXpUh4EdMhl4SVdF_6--xZIb784tgszm5w=s120-c-rp-mo-br100
77 ms
Desire-Marketing-1.png
21 ms
Desire-Marketing-2.png
38 ms
Desire-Marketing-3.png
25 ms
Backlinks-from-High-Traffic-and-Relavency-websites-compressed-768x474.jpg
22 ms
Slazzer.png
23 ms
NordVPN.png
25 ms
TestSigma.png
39 ms
VPNOverview-Logo.png
40 ms
SetApp_Logo.png
46 ms
Backlink_2-768x506-compressed.jpg
45 ms
HubSpot_Logo.png
46 ms
NameCheap_Logo.png
56 ms
Wix_Logo.png
57 ms
Themeforest_Logo.png
59 ms
Bigecommerce.png
66 ms
Desire-Marketing-1-1024x239.png
67 ms
ALV-UjWjuQ13bGtK1xJIA1wRflvBzYMpWAD_X-qL-qS43Al7cAo=s120-c-rp-mo-br100
124 ms
ALV-UjXHkqyD4Aen7fWWWnY2_Xe0X4UrA57gm2xCCjcSyjvS1Q=s120-c-rp-mo-br100
412 ms
desire.marketing accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
desire.marketing best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
desire.marketing SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Desire.marketing can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Desire.marketing main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
desire.marketing
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Desire. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: