Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 34% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

devasena.net

Website Design Company - Website Development - SEO Services - Ecommerce Web Design | Devasena

Page Load Speed

9 sec in total

First Response

1.6 sec

Resources Loaded

6.5 sec

Page Rendered

875 ms

devasena.net screenshot

About Website

Visit devasena.net now to see the best up-to-date Devasena content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about devasena.net

We are the best website designing company in chennai. We are doing Website Design, Website Development, Seo Services, Ecommerce wesite, Graphic Designs, Mobile Applications, Billing Softwares etc..

Visit devasena.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Devasena.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 7.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

devasena.net performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.8 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value510 ms

57/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.021

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.2 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

devasena.net

1649 ms

css

43 ms

style.min.css

1867 ms

grid.min.css

1439 ms

layout.min.css

1444 ms

Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Devasena.net, 14% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Devasena.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (44%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Devasena.net main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 158.1 kB

  • Original 181.8 kB
  • After minification 142.2 kB
  • After compression 23.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 39.6 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 158.1 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 428.2 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Devasena needs image optimization as it can save up to 428.2 kB or 27% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 369.1 kB

  • Original 752.3 kB
  • After minification 703.7 kB
  • After compression 383.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 369.1 kB or 49% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 357.2 kB

  • Original 427.2 kB
  • After minification 426.6 kB
  • After compression 70.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Devasena.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 357.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (47%)

Requests Now

74

After Optimization

39

The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Devasena. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

devasena.net accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

devasena.net best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

devasena.net SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Devasena.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Devasena.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Devasena. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: