Tools & Wizards About Us
dierverzekeringvergelijking.nl screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

dierverzekeringvergelijking.nl

Vergelijk huisdierenverzekeringen met een handig vergoedingenoverzicht

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

142 ms

dierverzekeringvergelijking.nl screenshot

About Website

Welcome to dierverzekeringvergelijking.nl homepage info - get ready to check Dierverzekering Vergelijk Ing best content right away, or after learning these important things about dierverzekeringvergelijking.nl

Wilt u uw kat of hond verzekeren? Bij Dierverzekeringvergelijking kunt u huisdierenverzekeringen vergelijken en zien waar u het goedkoopste uit bent. Wij vergelijken de premies van alle grote huisdier...

Visit dierverzekeringvergelijking.nl

Key Findings

We analyzed Dierverzekeringvergelijking.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

dierverzekeringvergelijking.nl performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

28/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.1 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value480 ms

60/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.5 s

48/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.dierverzekeringvergelijking.nl

1063 ms

style.css

88 ms

uc.js

26 ms

layout.css

173 ms

style.min.css

239 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Dierverzekeringvergelijking.nl, 6% (2 requests) were made to A1.awin1.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Zooplus.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Dierverzekeringvergelijking.nl.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 154.9 kB (23%)

Content Size

680.6 kB

After Optimization

525.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Dierverzekeringvergelijking.nl main page is 680.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 480.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 33.3 kB

  • Original 41.6 kB
  • After minification 39.6 kB
  • After compression 8.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.3 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 86.5 kB

  • Original 480.9 kB
  • After minification 394.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Dierverzekering Vergelijk Ing needs image optimization as it can save up to 86.5 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 21.9 kB

  • Original 115.2 kB
  • After minification 115.2 kB
  • After compression 93.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 21.9 kB or 19% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 13.2 kB

  • Original 42.9 kB
  • After minification 42.9 kB
  • After compression 29.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dierverzekeringvergelijking.nl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.2 kB or 31% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (66%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dierverzekering Vergelijk Ing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.dierverzekeringvergelijking.nl

www.dierverzekeringvergelijking.nl

1063 ms

style.css

style.css

88 ms

uc.js

uc.js

26 ms

layout.css

layout.css

173 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

239 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

246 ms

styles.css

styles.css

256 ms

tablepress-combined.min.css

tablepress-combined.min.css

258 ms

front.css

front.css

266 ms

generator.php

generator.php

267 ms

www.dierverzekeringvergelijking.nl

www.dierverzekeringvergelijking.nl

779 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

421 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

340 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

344 ms

third-party.js

third-party.js

353 ms

slides.min.jquery.js

slides.min.jquery.js

354 ms

feedback.js

feedback.js

424 ms

general.js

general.js

429 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

441 ms

custom.css

custom.css

442 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

499 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

507 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

513 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

408 ms

index.php

index.php

347 ms

dierverzekeringvergelijking.png

dierverzekeringvergelijking.png

258 ms

dierenarts-peterklaver.jpg

dierenarts-peterklaver.jpg

177 ms

dierenverzekering-overzicht.png

dierenverzekering-overzicht.png

255 ms

Vergelijk-huisdierverzekeringen.png

Vergelijk-huisdierverzekeringen.png

90 ms

huisdieren-verzekering.jpg

huisdieren-verzekering.jpg

83 ms

img500x500-kat-1708337233921.jpg

img500x500-kat-1708337233921.jpg

36 ms

img0503huisdieren300x250-1553679810874.jpg

img0503huisdieren300x250-1553679810874.jpg

4 ms

234x60_zooplus_40pro_NL.gif

234x60_zooplus_40pro_NL.gif

37 ms

234x60_zooplus_40pro_NL.gif

234x60_zooplus_40pro_NL.gif

342 ms

234x60_zooplus_40pro_NL.gif

234x60_zooplus_40pro_NL.gif

21 ms

Accessibility Review

dierverzekeringvergelijking.nl accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

dierverzekeringvergelijking.nl best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

dierverzekeringvergelijking.nl SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    NL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dierverzekeringvergelijking.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dierverzekeringvergelijking.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

dierverzekeringvergelijking.nl

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Dierverzekering Vergelijk Ing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: