Tools & Wizards About Us
duckworthconstruction.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

duckworthconstruction.com

Commercial Construction | Northeast Florida | LAY Construction

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

87 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

duckworthconstruction.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Duckworth Construction content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about duckworthconstruction.com

You deserve a smooth and transparent build process. Searching for a commercial construction builder is stressful—we're here to help get the job done right.

Visit duckworthconstruction.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Duckworthconstruction.com page load time and found that the first response time was 87 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

duckworthconstruction.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.8 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,360 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.9 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

duckworthconstruction.com

87 ms

lay-construction.com

153 ms

dox4kds.css

123 ms

style-blocks.build.css

19 ms

css

58 ms

Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Duckworthconstruction.com, 70% (58 requests) were made to Lay-construction.com and 22% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (476 ms) relates to the external source Lay-construction.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 188.6 kB (8%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Duckworthconstruction.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 104.4 kB

  • Original 123.7 kB
  • After minification 118.6 kB
  • After compression 19.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 104.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 78.7 kB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Duckworth Construction images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 158.1 kB
  • After minification 158.1 kB
  • After compression 156.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 4.0 kB

  • Original 131.0 kB
  • After minification 130.7 kB
  • After compression 127.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Duckworthconstruction.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (77%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Duckworth Construction. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

duckworthconstruction.com

duckworthconstruction.com

87 ms

lay-construction.com

lay-construction.com

153 ms

dox4kds.css

dox4kds.css

123 ms

style-blocks.build.css

style-blocks.build.css

19 ms

css

css

58 ms

unsemantic-grid.min.css

unsemantic-grid.min.css

29 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

84 ms

mobile.min.css

mobile.min.css

97 ms

font-icons.min.css

font-icons.min.css

41 ms

style.css

style.css

54 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

39 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

41 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

109 ms

post-900.css

post-900.css

151 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

57 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

83 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

87 ms

post-1186.css

post-1186.css

129 ms

post-1179.css

post-1179.css

136 ms

post-111.css

post-111.css

93 ms

css

css

77 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

167 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

109 ms

regular.min.css

regular.min.css

217 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

122 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

137 ms

post-1295.css

post-1295.css

201 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

145 ms

dismiss.js

dismiss.js

146 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

156 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

384 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

156 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

173 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

170 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

385 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

182 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

190 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

198 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

201 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

380 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

208 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

202 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

363 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

352 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

353 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

380 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

340 ms

p.css

p.css

30 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

271 ms

Lay-Logo-Color-Cropped-300x159.png

Lay-Logo-Color-Cropped-300x159.png

154 ms

icons8-target-64@2x.png

icons8-target-64@2x.png

281 ms

icons8-chat-64@2x.png

icons8-chat-64@2x.png

288 ms

icons8-development-skill-100@2x.png

icons8-development-skill-100@2x.png

282 ms

82-repeat-business.jpg

82-repeat-business.jpg

287 ms

Lippes-Mathias-Wexler-Friedman-5of21.jpg

Lippes-Mathias-Wexler-Friedman-5of21.jpg

330 ms

maximize.svg

maximize.svg

154 ms

1O8A1761.jpg

1O8A1761.jpg

289 ms

Sierra-Grille_15.jpg

Sierra-Grille_15.jpg

476 ms

1O8A1872-1024x683.jpg

1O8A1872-1024x683.jpg

476 ms

icons8-collaboration-80@2x.png

icons8-collaboration-80@2x.png

389 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff

142 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aXw.woff

183 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aXw.woff

182 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aXw.woff

144 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aXw.woff

143 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aXw.woff

185 ms

font

font

187 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aXw.woff

187 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aXw.woff

184 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

247 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

244 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R9WXh0oA.woff

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R9WXh0oA.woff

187 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq5Z9WXh0oA.woff

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq5Z9WXh0oA.woff

187 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq_p9WXh0oA.woff

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq_p9WXh0oA.woff

190 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR9WXh0oA.woff

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR9WXh0oA.woff

189 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R8WXh0oA.woff

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R8WXh0oA.woff

189 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq3p6WXh0oA.woff

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq3p6WXh0oA.woff

188 ms

font

font

191 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR6WXh0oA.woff

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR6WXh0oA.woff

189 ms

font

font

242 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

326 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

326 ms

js

js

126 ms

Accessibility Review

duckworthconstruction.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

duckworthconstruction.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

duckworthconstruction.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Duckworthconstruction.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Duckworthconstruction.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

duckworthconstruction.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Duckworth Construction. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: