Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

battery-storage.energytechreview.com

Energy Tech Review: Technology Magazine for Energy

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

147 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

198 ms

battery-storage.energytechreview.com screenshot

About Website

Visit battery-storage.energytechreview.com now to see the best up-to-date Battery Storage Energy Tech Review content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about battery-storage.energytechreview.com

nergy Tech Review is a print and digital magazine that aggregates the brightest of minds, expert opinions, latest energy technologies news, analyses, and argument about the critical issues that exist ...

Visit battery-storage.energytechreview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Battery-storage.energytechreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 147 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

battery-storage.energytechreview.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

56/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,860 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.25

50/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.6 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

battery-storage.energytechreview.com

147 ms

battery-storage.energytechreview.com

551 ms

bootstrap.css

527 ms

font-awesome.min.css

360 ms

animate.css

426 ms

Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Battery-storage.energytechreview.com, 58% (48 requests) were made to Energytechreview.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (695 ms) relates to the external source Energytechreview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 89.7 kB (13%)

Content Size

664.7 kB

After Optimization

575.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Battery-storage.energytechreview.com main page is 664.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 282.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 60.8 kB

  • Original 78.1 kB
  • After minification 77.4 kB
  • After compression 17.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 4.4 kB

  • Original 244.1 kB
  • After minification 239.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Battery Storage Energy Tech Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 6.6 kB

  • Original 282.1 kB
  • After minification 282.1 kB
  • After compression 275.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 17.9 kB

  • Original 60.3 kB
  • After minification 52.9 kB
  • After compression 42.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Battery-storage.energytechreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.9 kB or 30% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (57%)

Requests Now

75

After Optimization

32

The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Battery Storage Energy Tech Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

battery-storage.energytechreview.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

battery-storage.energytechreview.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

battery-storage.energytechreview.com SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Battery-storage.energytechreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Battery-storage.energytechreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Battery Storage Energy Tech Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: