Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

Page Load Speed

10 sec in total

First Response

766 ms

Resources Loaded

8.5 sec

Page Rendered

746 ms

eachamps.rw screenshot

About Website

Welcome to eachamps.rw homepage info - get ready to check Eachamps best content for Rwanda right away, or after learning these important things about eachamps.rw

Rwanda No. 1 Entertainment website that provides you with the latest Celebs news, Gossips & showbiz from Rwanda, Africa.

Visit eachamps.rw

Key Findings

We analyzed Eachamps.rw page load time and found that the first response time was 766 ms and then it took 9.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

eachamps.rw performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

36/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.1 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,870 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.344

32/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.4 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

eachamps.rw

766 ms

eachamps.rw

2409 ms

style.css

1030 ms

all.min.css

1013 ms

night.min.css

789 ms

Our browser made a total of 151 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Eachamps.rw, 33% (50 requests) were made to I.ytimg.com and 30% (46 requests) were made to Yt3.ggpht.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Eachamps.rw.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 243.5 kB (10%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Eachamps.rw main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 181.6 kB

  • Original 201.2 kB
  • After minification 133.7 kB
  • After compression 19.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 67.5 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 181.6 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 129 B

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eachamps images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 43.7 kB

  • Original 157.5 kB
  • After minification 157.5 kB
  • After compression 113.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 43.7 kB or 28% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 18.1 kB

  • Original 38.5 kB
  • After minification 20.7 kB
  • After compression 20.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eachamps.rw needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.1 kB or 47% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (16%)

Requests Now

140

After Optimization

118

The browser has sent 140 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eachamps. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

eachamps.rw accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

eachamps.rw best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

eachamps.rw SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eachamps.rw can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eachamps.rw main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Eachamps. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: