Tools & Wizards About Us
earpiercingtypes.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

earpiercingtypes.com

earpiercingtypes.com

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

675 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

529 ms

earpiercingtypes.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Earpiercingtypes content for South Korea. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about earpiercingtypes.com

This domain may be for sale!

Visit earpiercingtypes.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Earpiercingtypes.com page load time and found that the first response time was 675 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

earpiercingtypes.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

40/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,020 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.083

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.6 s

58/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

earpiercingtypes.com

675 ms

1e27c.css

558 ms

jquery.min.js

49 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

499 ms

customscript.js

31 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Earpiercingtypes.com, 11% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (679 ms) relates to the external source Acceptable.a-ads.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 27.0 kB (15%)

Content Size

177.6 kB

After Optimization

150.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Earpiercingtypes.com main page is 177.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 72.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 24.7 kB

  • Original 30.4 kB
  • After minification 30.4 kB
  • After compression 5.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.7 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 565 B

  • Original 46.6 kB
  • After minification 46.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Earpiercingtypes images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 72.8 kB
  • After minification 72.8 kB
  • After compression 71.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 758 B

  • Original 27.8 kB
  • After minification 27.8 kB
  • After compression 27.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Earpiercingtypes.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (50%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Earpiercingtypes. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

earpiercingtypes.com

earpiercingtypes.com

675 ms

1e27c.css

1e27c.css

558 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

49 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

499 ms

customscript.js

customscript.js

31 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

435 ms

js

js

84 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

28 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

42 ms

linkvertise.js

linkvertise.js

64 ms

1401787

1401787

679 ms

5121

5121

517 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

52 ms

logo.png

logo.png

15 ms

ear-piercing-types-1.jpg

ear-piercing-types-1.jpg

51 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

15 ms

collect

collect

15 ms

collect

collect

31 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

42 ms

Accessibility Review

earpiercingtypes.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

earpiercingtypes.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

earpiercingtypes.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Earpiercingtypes.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Earpiercingtypes.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

earpiercingtypes.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Earpiercingtypes. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: