2.2 sec in total
161 ms
1.2 sec
849 ms
Click here to check amazing Edgemac content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about edgemac.com
Visit edgemac.comWe analyzed Edgemac.com page load time and found that the first response time was 161 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
edgemac.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
24/100
10%
Value5.3 s
22/100
25%
Value6.8 s
35/100
10%
Value1,070 ms
25/100
30%
Value0.036
100/100
15%
Value12.3 s
15/100
10%
161 ms
75 ms
43 ms
16 ms
100 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Edgemac.com, 88% (74 requests) were made to Incenterdiligence.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (326 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 357.4 kB (15%)
2.3 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Edgemac.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 100.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 100.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 153 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Edgemac images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 92.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 92.8 kB or 22% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 163.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Edgemac.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 163.6 kB or 52% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (57%)
72
31
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Edgemac. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
edgemac.com
161 ms
www.incenterdiligence.com
75 ms
incenterdiligence.com
43 ms
style.min.css
16 ms
css
100 ms
wp_powgasdahc_dtb-style-3862172.css
27 ms
style-static.min.css
32 ms
style.css
29 ms
jquery.min.js
30 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
25 ms
et-core-unified-tb-50679-tb-71640-72184.min.css
80 ms
et-core-unified-72184.min.css
81 ms
gravity-forms-theme-reset.min.css
82 ms
gravity-forms-theme-foundation.min.css
78 ms
gravity-forms-theme-framework.min.css
80 ms
basic.min.css
79 ms
theme-ie11.min.css
83 ms
theme.min.css
232 ms
effect.min.js
86 ms
scripts.min.js
89 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
83 ms
comment-reply.min.js
84 ms
jquery.mobile.js
87 ms
magnific-popup.js
85 ms
easypiechart.js
86 ms
salvattore.js
89 ms
common.js
90 ms
toolbox-scripts.js
227 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
225 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
246 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
226 ms
dom-ready.min.js
255 ms
hooks.min.js
247 ms
i18n.min.js
248 ms
a11y.min.js
249 ms
jquery.json.min.js
248 ms
gravityforms.min.js
248 ms
jquery.maskedinput.min.js
253 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
243 ms
utils.min.js
232 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
233 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
232 ms
motion-effects.js
232 ms
sticky-elements.js
258 ms
gtm.js
316 ms
IDS-Horiz-ko-Alt.png
183 ms
Header-bg-1.webp
186 ms
using-calculator.webp
183 ms
goodbye.webp
186 ms
top-left-1.svg
179 ms
bottom-left-2.svg
180 ms
top-right-1.svg
182 ms
bottom-right-1.svg
187 ms
structuredfinanceassociation.svg
189 ms
MBA_Logo.svg
186 ms
SP_Global_Ratings.svg
190 ms
Kroll.svg
191 ms
moodys.svg
193 ms
fitch-ratings.svg
192 ms
morningstardbrs.svg
195 ms
outside-the-box.svg
195 ms
doing-business.jpg
198 ms
bg-header-overlay-home.png
197 ms
IDS-News10.jpg
196 ms
IDS-News9.jpg
195 ms
IDS-News8.jpg
180 ms
IDS-News7.jpg
179 ms
IDS-News6.jpg
176 ms
IDS-News4.jpg
297 ms
IDS-News1d-1.jpg
181 ms
IDS-News5.jpg
179 ms
IDS-News2.jpg
176 ms
IDS-News3.jpg
175 ms
incenter-logo-green-formaly.webp
175 ms
Proxima-Nova-Regular-1.otf
173 ms
Proxima-Nova-Bold-1.otf
116 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc-.woff
237 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxM.woff
238 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc-.woff
316 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzQ.woff
326 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc-.woff
326 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc-.woff
326 ms
modules.woff
116 ms
js
108 ms
edgemac.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
edgemac.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
edgemac.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Edgemac.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Edgemac.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
edgemac.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Edgemac. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: