Tools & Wizards About Us
efcl.info screenshot

Report Summary

  • 92

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    92% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

efcl.info

Web Scratch

Page Load Speed

565 ms in total

First Response

73 ms

Resources Loaded

359 ms

Page Rendered

133 ms

efcl.info screenshot

About Website

Visit efcl.info now to see the best up-to-date Efcl content for Japan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about efcl.info

ブラウザ/JavaScript等についてのブログ

Visit efcl.info

Key Findings

We analyzed Efcl.info page load time and found that the first response time was 73 ms and then it took 492 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

efcl.info performance score

92

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

72/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.3 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.013

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.9 s

96/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

efcl.info

73 ms

efcl.info

41 ms

main.css

23 ms

js

61 ms

forkme_right_darkblue_121621.png

12 ms

Our browser made a total of 12 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Efcl.info, 8% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 8% (1 request) were made to Github.blog. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (191 ms) belongs to the original domain Efcl.info.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 10.0 kB (6%)

Content Size

172.1 kB

After Optimization

162.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Efcl.info main page is 172.1 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 158.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 10.0 kB

  • Original 13.3 kB
  • After minification 11.2 kB
  • After compression 3.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.0 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.0 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 24 B

  • Original 158.9 kB
  • After minification 158.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Efcl images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Efcl. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

efcl.info

efcl.info

73 ms

efcl.info

efcl.info

41 ms

main.css

main.css

23 ms

js

js

61 ms

forkme_right_darkblue_121621.png

forkme_right_darkblue_121621.png

12 ms

reimu-right.png

reimu-right.png

136 ms

azu.png

azu.png

191 ms

twitter.svg

twitter.svg

54 ms

bluesky.svg

bluesky.svg

55 ms

github.svg

github.svg

150 ms

feed.svg

feed.svg

124 ms

search.svg

search.svg

143 ms

Accessibility Review

efcl.info accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

efcl.info best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

efcl.info SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Efcl.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Efcl.info main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

efcl.info

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Efcl. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: