Tools & Wizards About Us
efsol.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 76

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

efsol.ru

EFSOL: Автоматизация бизнеса на базе 1С. Облачные решения.

Page Load Speed

5 sec in total

First Response

885 ms

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

315 ms

efsol.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing EFSOL content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about efsol.ru

Реализуем современные решения для автоматизации бизнеса. Предоставляем облачные сервисы и ИТ-услуги.

Visit efsol.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Efsol.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 885 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

efsol.ru performance score

76

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

55/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

72/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

92/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.112

87/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.2 s

85/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

efsol.ru

885 ms

bootstrap.min.css

13 ms

lr_default.css

293 ms

lr_bootstrap.css

289 ms

css

62 ms

Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Efsol.ru, 5% (5 requests) were made to Google.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Efsol.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 724.1 kB (36%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Efsol.ru main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 994.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 42.0 kB

  • Original 55.7 kB
  • After minification 49.2 kB
  • After compression 13.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.5 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.0 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 37.3 kB

  • Original 994.1 kB
  • After minification 956.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EFSOL images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 470.4 kB

  • Original 679.0 kB
  • After minification 620.5 kB
  • After compression 208.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 470.4 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 174.4 kB

  • Original 294.0 kB
  • After minification 288.7 kB
  • After compression 119.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Efsol.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 174.4 kB or 59% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (55%)

Requests Now

84

After Optimization

38

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EFSOL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

efsol.ru

efsol.ru

885 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

13 ms

lr_default.css

lr_default.css

293 ms

lr_bootstrap.css

lr_bootstrap.css

289 ms

css

css

62 ms

core.css

core.css

299 ms

ajax.css

ajax.css

295 ms

style.css

style.css

292 ms

style.css

style.css

305 ms

core.js

core.js

570 ms

core_ajax.js

core_ajax.js

580 ms

session.js

session.js

579 ms

ajax.js

ajax.js

577 ms

api.js

api.js

64 ms

ip.php

ip.php

328 ms

orphus.js

orphus.js

643 ms

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

527 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

18 ms

flux.min.js

flux.min.js

737 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

763 ms

tabs.js

tabs.js

742 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

743 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

775 ms

efsol_new.js

efsol_new.js

771 ms

ba.js

ba.js

165 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

115 ms

efsol_logo3a.png

efsol_logo3a.png

542 ms

icon_skype.png

icon_skype.png

544 ms

its-baner-vebinar.png

its-baner-vebinar.png

554 ms

slide-2.jpg

slide-2.jpg

568 ms

slide-3.jpg

slide-3.jpg

564 ms

slide2.jpg

slide2.jpg

582 ms

slide5b-min.jpg

slide5b-min.jpg

832 ms

min-its.png

min-its.png

828 ms

2-tn.jpg

2-tn.jpg

841 ms

3-tn.jpg

3-tn.jpg

844 ms

slide2_tn.jpg

slide2_tn.jpg

847 ms

slide5_tn-min.jpg

slide5_tn-min.jpg

872 ms

h2_bg.png

h2_bg.png

1117 ms

1.png

1.png

1112 ms

2.png

2.png

1126 ms

3.png

3.png

1132 ms

4.png

4.png

1156 ms

avt-dost1.png

avt-dost1.png

1154 ms

5.png

5.png

1420 ms

tz_input_name.png

tz_input_name.png

1412 ms

tz_input_phone.png

tz_input_phone.png

1269 ms

tz_input_mail.png

tz_input_mail.png

1413 ms

captcha.php

captcha.php

1371 ms

tz_input_submit2.png

tz_input_submit2.png

1461 ms

sibur-logo.png

sibur-logo.png

1558 ms

ecco-logo.png

ecco-logo.png

1649 ms

gallery-logo.png

gallery-logo.png

1702 ms

skylink-logo.png

skylink-logo.png

1519 ms

gtlk-logo.png

gtlk-logo.png

1534 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSmeP1y_Bkidl4ESyB_O2G_c.ttf

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSmeP1y_Bkidl4ESyB_O2G_c.ttf

39 ms

K88pR3goAWT7BTt32Z01m6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

K88pR3goAWT7BTt32Z01m6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

88 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTWeP1y_Bkidl4ESyB_O2G_c.ttf

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTWeP1y_Bkidl4ESyB_O2G_c.ttf

89 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

15 ms

upeco-logo.png

upeco-logo.png

1604 ms

geostream-logo.png

geostream-logo.png

1591 ms

tngs-logo.png

tngs-logo.png

1595 ms

master-metall-logo.png

master-metall-logo.png

1465 ms

medianet-logo.png

medianet-logo.png

1507 ms

farwest-logo.png

farwest-logo.png

1653 ms

watch.js

watch.js

179 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

70 ms

widget.js

widget.js

166 ms

bx_stat

bx_stat

271 ms

anchor

anchor

61 ms

anchor

anchor

69 ms

amvit-logo.png

amvit-logo.png

1612 ms

collect

collect

17 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

19 ms

At3P4syA0M4f12SrLPdY1luM5tqBU_z9GVCWLiREY00.js

At3P4syA0M4f12SrLPdY1luM5tqBU_z9GVCWLiREY00.js

17 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

18 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

22 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

62 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

76 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

18 ms

widget.js

widget.js

1142 ms

watch.js

watch.js

430 ms

icon_fb.png

icon_fb.png

1470 ms

icon_lj.png

icon_lj.png

1556 ms

icon_twitter.png

icon_twitter.png

1577 ms

icon_youtube.png

icon_youtube.png

1443 ms

icon_in.png

icon_in.png

1650 ms

orphus.gif

orphus.gif

1693 ms

captcha.php

captcha.php

1518 ms

advert.gif

advert.gif

85 ms

1

1

85 ms

orange.css

orange.css

438 ms

logo.png

logo.png

342 ms

Accessibility Review

efsol.ru accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

efsol.ru best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

efsol.ru SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1251

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Efsol.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Efsol.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

efsol.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of EFSOL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: