Tools & Wizards About Us
emashipping.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

emashipping.com

Global Freight & Logistics Solutions

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

818 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

358 ms

emashipping.com screenshot

About Website

Visit emashipping.com now to see the best up-to-date Emashipping content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about emashipping.com

Discover top-notch global freight & logistics solutions with reliable, efficient, and cost-effective services tailored to your business needs.

Visit emashipping.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Emashipping.com page load time and found that the first response time was 818 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

emashipping.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.8 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value450 ms

62/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.183

66/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.8 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

emashipping.com

818 ms

style.min.css

222 ms

custom-color-overrides.css

166 ms

styles.css

114 ms

style.css

383 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Emashipping.com, 17% (8 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (818 ms) belongs to the original domain Emashipping.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 914.0 kB (86%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

154.2 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Emashipping.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 850.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 45.8 kB

  • Original 57.6 kB
  • After minification 56.6 kB
  • After compression 11.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 107.6 kB

  • Original 160.5 kB
  • After minification 157.1 kB
  • After compression 52.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 107.6 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 760.5 kB

  • Original 850.1 kB
  • After minification 815.9 kB
  • After compression 89.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Emashipping.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 760.5 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (56%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

19

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Emashipping. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

emashipping.com

emashipping.com

818 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

222 ms

custom-color-overrides.css

custom-color-overrides.css

166 ms

styles.css

styles.css

114 ms

style.css

style.css

383 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

440 ms

css2

css2

41 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

43 ms

slick.min.css

slick.min.css

56 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

63 ms

custom.css

custom.css

221 ms

resize.css

resize.css

222 ms

js

js

70 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

224 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

171 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

224 ms

index.js

index.js

224 ms

index.js

index.js

226 ms

primary-navigation.js

primary-navigation.js

279 ms

responsive-embeds.js

responsive-embeds.js

279 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

334 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

281 ms

vc-waypoints.min.js

vc-waypoints.min.js

334 ms

fancybox.umd.js

fancybox.umd.js

30 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

15 ms

logo.webp

logo.webp

64 ms

slider-01.webp

slider-01.webp

223 ms

slider-02.webp

slider-02.webp

386 ms

about-img-cropped.webp

about-img-cropped.webp

63 ms

full-logistics-bg.webp

full-logistics-bg.webp

232 ms

why-choose-bg.webp

why-choose-bg.webp

115 ms

why-choose-list-icon-01.webp

why-choose-list-icon-01.webp

116 ms

containers-icon.webp

containers-icon.webp

116 ms

ports-icon.webp

ports-icon.webp

171 ms

positivity-icon.webp

positivity-icon.webp

172 ms

shipments-icon.webp

shipments-icon.webp

172 ms

footer-bg.webp

footer-bg.webp

342 ms

karachi-loc.webp

karachi-loc.webp

228 ms

dubai-loc.webp

dubai-loc.webp

231 ms

lahore-loc.webp

lahore-loc.webp

279 ms

sialkot-loc.webp

sialkot-loc.webp

288 ms

why-choose-list-icon-02.webp

why-choose-list-icon-02.webp

250 ms

fa-v4compatibility.ttf

fa-v4compatibility.ttf

20 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

10 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

19 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

22 ms

polyfills.js

polyfills.js

248 ms

print.css

print.css

57 ms

Accessibility Review

emashipping.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

emashipping.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

emashipping.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Emashipping.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Emashipping.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

emashipping.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Emashipping. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: