Tools & Wizards About Us
employmentlawhq.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 74

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

employmentlawhq.com

Who is eligible for FMLA? Try our FMLA eligibility questionnaire

Page Load Speed

368 ms in total

First Response

50 ms

Resources Loaded

228 ms

Page Rendered

90 ms

employmentlawhq.com screenshot

About Website

Visit employmentlawhq.com now to see the best up-to-date Employmentlawhq content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about employmentlawhq.com

If you aren’t sure who is eligible for FMLA, our free FMLA eligibility report can help. Answer a few short questions and get a personalized eligibility report.

Visit employmentlawhq.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Employmentlawhq.com page load time and found that the first response time was 50 ms and then it took 318 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

employmentlawhq.com performance score

74

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

79/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

13/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.6 s

81/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

employmentlawhq.com

50 ms

www.employmentlawhq.com

50 ms

bootstrap.min.css

25 ms

style.css

30 ms

TopShadow.png

25 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Employmentlawhq.com, 8% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Brinkerpublishing.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (79 ms) relates to the external source Vlog.leadformix.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 301.1 kB (64%)

Content Size

468.9 kB

After Optimization

167.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Employmentlawhq.com main page is 468.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 292.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 7.2 kB

  • Original 9.7 kB
  • After minification 6.4 kB
  • After compression 2.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.3 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.2 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 200.3 kB

  • Original 292.8 kB
  • After minification 92.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Employmentlawhq needs image optimization as it can save up to 200.3 kB or 68% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 17.0 kB

  • Original 74.3 kB
  • After minification 74.0 kB
  • After compression 57.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 17.0 kB or 23% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 76.7 kB

  • Original 92.1 kB
  • After minification 88.6 kB
  • After compression 15.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Employmentlawhq.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 76.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (19%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Employmentlawhq. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

employmentlawhq.com

employmentlawhq.com

50 ms

www.employmentlawhq.com

www.employmentlawhq.com

50 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

25 ms

style.css

style.css

30 ms

TopShadow.png

TopShadow.png

25 ms

logo.png

logo.png

29 ms

new-blog-add.png

new-blog-add.png

41 ms

Today.png

Today.png

43 ms

MacBook.png

MacBook.png

43 ms

Bear.png

Bear.png

39 ms

Note.png

Note.png

40 ms

Blank.png

Blank.png

41 ms

FormBkg.png

FormBkg.png

50 ms

click_here.png

click_here.png

41 ms

click_here_button.png

click_here_button.png

42 ms

facebook.jpg

facebook.jpg

41 ms

twitter.jpg

twitter.jpg

47 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

17 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

47 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

49 ms

script.js

script.js

49 ms

ga.js

ga.js

32 ms

lfx.js

lfx.js

79 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

11 ms

Accessibility Review

employmentlawhq.com accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

employmentlawhq.com best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

employmentlawhq.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Document uses plugins

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Employmentlawhq.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Employmentlawhq.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

employmentlawhq.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Employmentlawhq. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: