Tools & Wizards About Us
emsales.us screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

emsales.us

One moment, please...

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

317 ms

emsales.us screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Emsales content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about emsales.us

We Buy/Sell Surplus, Reconditioned and Used Industrial and Commercial Electrical Parts. Call Us Now! (734) 284-8711

Visit emsales.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Emsales.us page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

emsales.us performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.0 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value500 ms

58/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.212

59/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.6 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.emsales.us

1261 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

59 ms

styles.css

60 ms

style.css

109 ms

responsive.css

65 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Emsales.us, 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Emsales.us.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 661.3 kB (18%)

Content Size

3.7 MB

After Optimization

3.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Emsales.us main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 57.4 kB

  • Original 71.9 kB
  • After minification 69.4 kB
  • After compression 14.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 554.3 kB

  • Original 3.3 MB
  • After minification 2.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Emsales needs image optimization as it can save up to 554.3 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.3 kB

  • Original 180.5 kB
  • After minification 180.5 kB
  • After compression 177.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 46.2 kB

  • Original 149.3 kB
  • After minification 103.4 kB
  • After compression 103.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Emsales.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 46.2 kB or 31% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (66%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Emsales. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.emsales.us

www.emsales.us

1261 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

59 ms

styles.css

styles.css

60 ms

style.css

style.css

109 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

65 ms

icons.css

icons.css

87 ms

dynamic-styles.css

dynamic-styles.css

81 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

133 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

128 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

101 ms

css

css

26 ms

css

css

56 ms

css

css

59 ms

css

css

56 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

54 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

151 ms

vc_entypo.min.css

vc_entypo.min.css

150 ms

vc_linecons_icons.min.css

vc_linecons_icons.min.css

198 ms

vc_carousel.min.css

vc_carousel.min.css

199 ms

lightbox.min.css

lightbox.min.css

199 ms

css

css

56 ms

socialsnap.css

socialsnap.css

200 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

211 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

213 ms

index.js

index.js

213 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

217 ms

jquery.flexslider.js

jquery.flexslider.js

213 ms

jquery.validate.js

jquery.validate.js

213 ms

responsivecarousel.min.js

responsivecarousel.min.js

213 ms

jquery.owl.carousel.min.js

jquery.owl.carousel.min.js

214 ms

jquery.custom.js

jquery.custom.js

213 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

215 ms

skrollr.min.js

skrollr.min.js

214 ms

transition.min.js

transition.min.js

215 ms

vc_carousel.min.js

vc_carousel.min.js

216 ms

lightbox.min.js

lightbox.min.js

216 ms

socialsnap.js

socialsnap.js

216 ms

embed

embed

286 ms

footer-3.png

footer-3.png

589 ms

emslogo636.png

emslogo636.png

219 ms

Control-Transformer2.jpg

Control-Transformer2.jpg

264 ms

E-Stop-Button2.jpg

E-Stop-Button2.jpg

250 ms

HMI-Panel2.jpg

HMI-Panel2.jpg

248 ms

image1.png

image1.png

271 ms

rendered.jpg

rendered.jpg

383 ms

font

font

156 ms

font

font

89 ms

font

font

147 ms

font

font

148 ms

Icomoon.woff

Icomoon.woff

250 ms

hbicons.woff

hbicons.woff

179 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

134 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

133 ms

vc_entypo.woff

vc_entypo.woff

149 ms

vc_linecons.woff

vc_linecons.woff

166 ms

prev.png

prev.png

56 ms

next.png

next.png

56 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

55 ms

close.png

close.png

74 ms

js

js

55 ms

Accessibility Review

emsales.us accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

emsales.us best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

emsales.us SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Emsales.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Emsales.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

emsales.us

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Emsales. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: