4.6 sec in total
1.2 sec
3.2 sec
124 ms
Welcome to en2.efax.com homepage info - get ready to check En 2 EFax best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about en2.efax.com
Login to your eFax account to view and send faxes, update account information and access our online help.
Visit en2.efax.comWe analyzed En2.efax.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
en2.efax.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
39/100
10%
Value7.4 s
4/100
25%
Value10.3 s
8/100
10%
Value8,510 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value21.2 s
1/100
10%
1195 ms
477 ms
302 ms
97 ms
107 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original En2.efax.com, 11% (7 requests) were made to Sassets.en.efax.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source En.efax.com.
Page size can be reduced by 532.6 kB (59%)
904.2 kB
371.6 kB
In fact, the total size of En2.efax.com main page is 904.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 422.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.7 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. En 2 EFax images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 263.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 263.6 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 230.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. En2.efax.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 230.7 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (67%)
57
19
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of En 2 EFax. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
en.efax.com
1195 ms
styles.less
477 ms
jqueryJS
302 ms
mbox.js
97 ms
mootools1-2_corenmore.js
107 ms
Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd
233 ms
bootstrap.css
293 ms
bootstrap.min.css
283 ms
main.css
209 ms
WebResource.axd
203 ms
Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd
355 ms
ScriptResource.axd
346 ms
Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd
314 ms
bootstrap.min.js
409 ms
internal.js
97 ms
subcookieJS
351 ms
bootstrapJS
369 ms
otherJS
451 ms
widgetJS
389 ms
main
669 ms
j.php
38 ms
ScriptResource.axd
80 ms
pano_micro.jpg
225 ms
efax.gif
95 ms
efax_badge.png
166 ms
iphone-black.png
166 ms
galaxy-white.png
223 ms
appstore_btn.gif
224 ms
playstore_btn.gif
225 ms
standard
42 ms
v.gif
4 ms
5-en-web-logo.gif
177 ms
standard
7 ms
phone50-53.gif
161 ms
standard
22 ms
nr-885.min.js
170 ms
banner-apps.png
235 ms
standard-footer.png
157 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
142 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
534 ms
gtm.js
113 ms
4aac183407
134 ms
34 ms
conversion_async.js
58 ms
analytics.js
36 ms
bat.js
136 ms
linkid.js
13 ms
50 ms
collect
19 ms
collect
65 ms
40 ms
35 ms
44 ms
45 ms
collect
23 ms
collect
72 ms
53 ms
65 ms
67 ms
66 ms
70 ms
4aac183407
24 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.ttf
433 ms
en2.efax.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
en2.efax.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
en2.efax.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise En2.efax.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that En2.efax.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
en2.efax.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of En 2 EFax. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: