Tools & Wizards About Us
eneepl.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

eneepl.com

Eneepl – Control Panel Manufacturer| All Types of Control Panel | HT and LT

Page Load Speed

20.1 sec in total

First Response

1.7 sec

Resources Loaded

17.3 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

eneepl.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Eneepl content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about eneepl.com

Visit eneepl.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Eneepl.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 18.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

eneepl.com performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.6 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value860 ms

33/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.598

11/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.4 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

eneepl.com

1691 ms

aos.css

1017 ms

css2

49 ms

bootstrap.min.css

1003 ms

all.min.css

40 ms

Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Eneepl.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Eneepl.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 352.8 kB (7%)

Content Size

5.0 MB

After Optimization

4.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Eneepl.com main page is 5.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 55.2 kB

  • Original 67.3 kB
  • After minification 56.8 kB
  • After compression 12.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.5 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 207.8 kB

  • Original 4.6 MB
  • After minification 4.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eneepl images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 38.8 kB

  • Original 124.3 kB
  • After minification 124.3 kB
  • After compression 85.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 38.8 kB or 31% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 51.0 kB

  • Original 129.1 kB
  • After minification 129.1 kB
  • After compression 78.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eneepl.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 51.0 kB or 39% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (34%)

Requests Now

83

After Optimization

55

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eneepl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

eneepl.com

eneepl.com

1691 ms

aos.css

aos.css

1017 ms

css2

css2

49 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

1003 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

40 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

65 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

757 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

762 ms

style.css

style.css

771 ms

styles.css

styles.css

1508 ms

cookieblocker.min.css

cookieblocker.min.css

1479 ms

ie.css

ie.css

1740 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

1774 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

1748 ms

post-1217.css

post-1217.css

1769 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

2223 ms

global.css

global.css

2267 ms

css

css

60 ms

timeme.min.js

timeme.min.js

2489 ms

burst.min.js

burst.min.js

2505 ms

js

js

101 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

2535 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

2536 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

2993 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

2828 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

3065 ms

index.js

index.js

3074 ms

index.js

index.js

3316 ms

primary-navigation.js

primary-navigation.js

3336 ms

responsive-embeds.js

responsive-embeds.js

3595 ms

logo.png

logo.png

1915 ms

slider-2-1568x645.jpg

slider-2-1568x645.jpg

2686 ms

slider-2-m.jpg

slider-2-m.jpg

3564 ms

slider-1-1568x645.jpg

slider-1-1568x645.jpg

2699 ms

slider-1-m.jpg

slider-1-m.jpg

3003 ms

slider-3-1568x645.jpg

slider-3-1568x645.jpg

2724 ms

slider-3-m.jpg

slider-3-m.jpg

3395 ms

WhatsApp-Image-2023-06-30-at-3.04.40-PM.jpeg

WhatsApp-Image-2023-06-30-at-3.04.40-PM.jpeg

4641 ms

WhatsApp-Image-2023-06-30-at-2.56.45-PM-1.jpeg

WhatsApp-Image-2023-06-30-at-2.56.45-PM-1.jpeg

4217 ms

WhatsApp-Image-2023-06-30-at-2.56.45-PM.jpeg

WhatsApp-Image-2023-06-30-at-2.56.45-PM.jpeg

4258 ms

WhatsApp-Image-2023-06-30-at-3.53.01-PM.jpeg

WhatsApp-Image-2023-06-30-at-3.53.01-PM.jpeg

4730 ms

probg.jpg

probg.jpg

6027 ms

Untitled-design-23.png

Untitled-design-23.png

4320 ms

Untitled-design-24.png

Untitled-design-24.png

4964 ms

3-1.png

3-1.png

4998 ms

4-1.png

4-1.png

5072 ms

5-1.png

5-1.png

5400 ms

6-1.png

6-1.png

5492 ms

certified.svg

certified.svg

5700 ms

review.svg

review.svg

5724 ms

communication.svg

communication.svg

5813 ms

Untitled-design-3.png

Untitled-design-3.png

6867 ms

Untitled-design-7.png

Untitled-design-7.png

6212 ms

Untitled-design-4.png

Untitled-design-4.png

7428 ms

Chandpole-Anajmandi-Jaipur.png

Chandpole-Anajmandi-Jaipur.png

6371 ms

font

font

42 ms

font

font

42 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

25 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

25 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

42 ms

Untitled-design-5.png

Untitled-design-5.png

7974 ms

Untitled-design-8.png

Untitled-design-8.png

6577 ms

Untitled-design-6-1.png

Untitled-design-6-1.png

7658 ms

Untitled-design-7-1.png

Untitled-design-7-1.png

6704 ms

Untitled-design-9.png

Untitled-design-9.png

7948 ms

Untitled-design-10.png

Untitled-design-10.png

6635 ms

Untitled-design-11.png

Untitled-design-11.png

8146 ms

Untitled-design-12.png

Untitled-design-12.png

7160 ms

polyfills.js

polyfills.js

7137 ms

11.png

11.png

7837 ms

15.png

15.png

7586 ms

16.png

16.png

7225 ms

12.png

12.png

6698 ms

9.png

9.png

7282 ms

13.png

13.png

7375 ms

8.png

8.png

7097 ms

14.png

14.png

6737 ms

10.png

10.png

6581 ms

7.png

7.png

6140 ms

4.png

4.png

6693 ms

3.png

3.png

6749 ms

2.png

2.png

6438 ms

1.png

1.png

6112 ms

5.png

5.png

6406 ms

6.png

6.png

6352 ms

logo-1.png

logo-1.png

6771 ms

pin-1.png

pin-1.png

6304 ms

print.css

print.css

760 ms

Accessibility Review

eneepl.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

eneepl.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

eneepl.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eneepl.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eneepl.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

eneepl.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Eneepl. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: