1.5 sec in total
37 ms
1 sec
417 ms
Welcome to enginetech.com homepage info - get ready to check Enginetech best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about enginetech.com
Family owned Enginetech has been delivering the goods to professional engine rebuilders since 1982. Enginetech, Inc. The Engine Builder's Source
Visit enginetech.comWe analyzed Enginetech.com page load time and found that the first response time was 37 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
enginetech.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
33/100
10%
Value7.0 s
6/100
25%
Value7.0 s
32/100
10%
Value1,850 ms
9/100
30%
Value0.107
88/100
15%
Value23.4 s
1/100
10%
37 ms
27 ms
12 ms
16 ms
34 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Enginetech.com, 24% (22 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (779 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 323.5 kB (20%)
1.6 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Enginetech.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 91.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 91.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 156.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Enginetech needs image optimization as it can save up to 156.3 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 24.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 24.9 kB or 11% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 50.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Enginetech.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 50.7 kB or 22% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (89%)
63
7
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Enginetech. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
enginetech.com
37 ms
enginetech.com
27 ms
bootstrap.min.css
12 ms
font-sizes.min.css
16 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
34 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
32 ms
style.css
33 ms
clients-bar.css
33 ms
style.min.css
34 ms
css
89 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
40 ms
custom-frontend.min.css
46 ms
swiper.min.css
41 ms
post-3845.css
42 ms
juicer-elementor.css
42 ms
custom-pro-frontend.min.css
54 ms
page-builder-style.css
53 ms
all.min.css
66 ms
v4-shims.min.css
53 ms
post-41.css
69 ms
modern.css
71 ms
css
106 ms
fontawesome.min.css
72 ms
brands.min.css
71 ms
solid.min.css
71 ms
jetpack.css
75 ms
jquery.min.js
79 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
74 ms
v4-shims.min.js
79 ms
js
104 ms
animations.min.css
78 ms
daterangepicker.css
84 ms
hooks.min.js
72 ms
i18n.min.js
78 ms
web-components.esm.js
78 ms
ctct-plugin-recaptcha-v2.min.js
78 ms
api.js
66 ms
ctct-plugin-frontend.min.js
78 ms
comment-reply.min.js
80 ms
bootstrap.min.js
79 ms
core.min.js
79 ms
script.min.js
80 ms
e-202432.js
67 ms
moment.min.js
88 ms
daterangepicker.min.js
98 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
80 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
73 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
75 ms
frontend.min.js
55 ms
waypoints.min.js
54 ms
frontend.min.js
55 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
55 ms
daterangepicker-init.js
47 ms
lazyload.min.js
45 ms
gtm.js
228 ms
fbevents.js
240 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrc.woff
257 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrc.woff
270 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff
272 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrc.woff
779 ms
cropped-imageedit_2_6714662142-Copy.png
217 ms
My-project-95-300x169.png
15 ms
DSC_1938-scaled.jpg
94 ms
ETb.gif
26 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff
115 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aXw.woff
116 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aXw.woff
113 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aXw.woff
113 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aXw.woff
115 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aXw.woff
155 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff
116 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aXw.woff
116 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aXw.woff
115 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
19 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
74 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
18 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoUoOmb2Rl.woff
116 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4Omb2Rl.woff
150 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoDIOmb2Rl.woff
149 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoJYOmb2Rl.woff
150 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjovoSmb2Rl.woff
178 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rl.woff
151 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSmb2Rl.woff
151 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoDISmb2Rl.woff
151 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojIWmb2Rl.woff
151 ms
embed
411 ms
js
36 ms
search.js
4 ms
geometry.js
7 ms
main.js
12 ms
enginetech.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
enginetech.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
enginetech.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Enginetech.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Enginetech.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
enginetech.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Enginetech. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: