Access entsafter-testsieger.net. Entsafter Test 2019 | Die 10 besten Modelle im Entsafter Vergleich

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

35/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

56/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

25/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value190 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.028

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.9 s

66/100

10%

entsafter-testsieger.net

1706 ms

font-awesome.min.css

336 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

332 ms

theme.css

444 ms

style.css

339 ms

Our browser made a total of 113 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (111 requests) were addressed to the original Entsafter-testsieger.net, 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Entsafter-testsieger.net.

Content Size

610.2 kB

After Optimization

517.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Entsafter-testsieger.net main page is 610.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 299.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 92.0 kB

Original 111.1 kB
After minification 110.9 kB
After compression 19.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 11 B

Original 299.4 kB
After minification 299.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Entsafter Test Sieger images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 428 B

Original 146.4 kB
After minification 146.4 kB
After compression 146.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 427 B

Original 53.3 kB
After minification 53.3 kB
After compression 52.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Entsafter-testsieger.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

111

After Optimization

The browser has sent 111 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Entsafter Test Sieger. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

Search Engine Optimization Advices

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

DE
Language Claimed

DE
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Entsafter-testsieger.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Entsafter-testsieger.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

entsafter-testsieger.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Entsafter Test Sieger. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Entsafter Test 2019 | Die 10 besten Modelle im Entsafter Vergleich

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

entsafter-testsieger.net

font-awesome.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

theme.css

style.css

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

entsafter-testsieger.net

font-awesome.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

theme.css

style.css

flexslider.min.css

header-42cd167f.min.css

header-36390fe9.min.js

comparison-functions.min.js

jquery.actual.min.js

filterTaxonomies.min.js

custom.php

footer-d77b17e6.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

datepicker-de.js

bootstrap.min.js

jquery.elevateZoom-3.0.8.min.js

scripts.min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.min.js

main-menu.min.js

fixed-menu.min.js

css

41-KXAu4vtL-289x300.jpg

41-KXAu4vtL-145x150.jpg

51DeAKgNZwL-150x139.jpg

51p5kfNYlqL-142x150.jpg

315eJklpaTL-150x143.jpg

41eJK7UfLDL-150x110.jpg

41MsKMX05KL-150x75.jpg

415BQS782FL-150x150.jpg

41jk2v2XE8L-90x150.jpg

412KUw1WbdL-117x150.jpg

418VCBCn8sL-150x150.jpg

4166IcYpbEL-150x150.jpg

41edsufLWVL-150x115.jpg

51TTuy0bn-L-137x150.jpg

51lswbwF2BgL-150x139.jpg

41RyEdxB2FL-93x150.jpg

51FbDjkfkFL-150x150.jpg

amazon-prime-icon.png

41gfSwfNDkL-150x130.jpg

41tyYtBR29L-130x150.jpg

41nTx2BIXTvL-132x150.jpg