Tools & Wizards About Us
epital.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

epital.ru

У Эпитал можно купить эпоксидные смолы, наливные полы, отвердители, связующие

Page Load Speed

6.5 sec in total

First Response

517 ms

Resources Loaded

5 sec

Page Rendered

973 ms

epital.ru screenshot

About Website

Welcome to epital.ru homepage info - get ready to check Epital best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about epital.ru

Эпитал производит, разрабатывает, заменяет импортные эпоксидные смолы, отвердители, связующие

Visit epital.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Epital.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 517 ms and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

epital.ru performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,480 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.174

69/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.9 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

epital.ru

517 ms

epital.ru

744 ms

tag.js

904 ms

intranet-common.min.css

835 ms

ui.design-tokens.min.css

854 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Epital.ru, 73% (41 requests) were made to Etal.ru and 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.bitrix24.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Etal.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 295.5 kB (34%)

Content Size

869.6 kB

After Optimization

574.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Epital.ru main page is 869.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 350.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 213.7 kB

  • Original 245.3 kB
  • After minification 242.4 kB
  • After compression 31.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 213.7 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 84.4 kB
  • After minification 84.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Epital images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 44.4 kB

  • Original 350.8 kB
  • After minification 350.8 kB
  • After compression 306.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 44.4 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 37.4 kB

  • Original 189.1 kB
  • After minification 189.1 kB
  • After compression 151.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Epital.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 37.4 kB or 20% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (88%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

6

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Epital. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

epital.ru

epital.ru

517 ms

epital.ru

epital.ru

744 ms

tag.js

tag.js

904 ms

intranet-common.min.css

intranet-common.min.css

835 ms

ui.design-tokens.min.css

ui.design-tokens.min.css

854 ms

bitrix24-design-tokens.min.css

bitrix24-design-tokens.min.css

855 ms

ui.font.opensans.min.css

ui.font.opensans.min.css

859 ms

main.popup.bundle.min.css

main.popup.bundle.min.css

860 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

861 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

1105 ms

sidepanel.min.css

sidepanel.min.css

1107 ms

core_date.min.css

core_date.min.css

1109 ms

ui.hint.min.css

ui.hint.min.css

1110 ms

landing_public.min.css

landing_public.min.css

1110 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

1137 ms

popup.min.css

popup.min.css

1114 ms

catalog_cond.min.css

catalog_cond.min.css

1126 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

1401 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

1684 ms

template_styles.min.css

template_styles.min.css

1134 ms

css2

css2

544 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1529 ms

dexie3.bundle.min.js

dexie3.bundle.min.js

1410 ms

core_ls.min.js

core_ls.min.js

1147 ms

core_fx.min.js

core_fx.min.js

1149 ms

core_frame_cache.min.js

core_frame_cache.min.js

1286 ms

protobuf.min.js

protobuf.min.js

1426 ms

model.min.js

model.min.js

1411 ms

rest.client.min.js

rest.client.min.js

1423 ms

pull.client.min.js

pull.client.min.js

1545 ms

metrika.bundle.min.js

metrika.bundle.min.js

1548 ms

pageobject.min.js

pageobject.min.js

1578 ms

main.popup.bundle.min.js

main.popup.bundle.min.js

1579 ms

core_clipboard.min.js

core_clipboard.min.js

1664 ms

manager.min.js

manager.min.js

1681 ms

slider.min.js

slider.min.js

1684 ms

main.date.min.js

main.date.min.js

1695 ms

core_date.min.js

core_date.min.js

1699 ms

core_window.min.js

core_window.min.js

1702 ms

core_tree.min.js

core_tree.min.js

1799 ms

664 ms

ui.hint.min.js

ui.hint.min.js

1114 ms

intersectionobserver.min.js

intersectionobserver.min.js

1100 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

1110 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

1109 ms

icon-base.css

icon-base.css

1112 ms

marble_1x.jpg

marble_1x.jpg

871 ms

UqyVK80NJXN4zfRgbdfbo55cUeUyZKA.woff

UqyVK80NJXN4zfRgbdfbo55cUeUyZKA.woff

192 ms

UqyVK80NJXN4zfRgbdfbo5BcUeUyZKAbcw.woff

UqyVK80NJXN4zfRgbdfbo5BcUeUyZKAbcw.woff

379 ms

UqyVK80NJXN4zfRgbdfbo5pcUeUyZKAbcw.woff

UqyVK80NJXN4zfRgbdfbo5pcUeUyZKAbcw.woff

414 ms

sync_cookie_image_decide

sync_cookie_image_decide

137 ms

1

1

137 ms

full-d4970f46344c5e9889e597ed64f3cc18926d2def.js

full-d4970f46344c5e9889e597ed64f3cc18926d2def.js

1663 ms

assets_webpack_6031588ced_1716011658.js

assets_webpack_6031588ced_1716011658.js

130 ms

ba.js

ba.js

283 ms

advert.gif

advert.gif

220 ms

Accessibility Review

epital.ru accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

epital.ru best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

epital.ru SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1251

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Epital.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Epital.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

epital.ru

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Epital. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: