2.6 sec in total
94 ms
2.1 sec
378 ms
Click here to check amazing Epona Tech content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about eponatech.com
Visit eponatech.comWe analyzed Eponatech.com page load time and found that the first response time was 94 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
eponatech.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value11.5 s
0/100
10%
Value18.0 s
0/100
25%
Value14.2 s
1/100
10%
Value400 ms
68/100
30%
Value0.032
100/100
15%
Value18.8 s
3/100
10%
94 ms
882 ms
67 ms
116 ms
71 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Eponatech.com, 59% (40 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 35% (24 requests) were made to Eponamind.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (882 ms) relates to the external source Eponamind.com.
Page size can be reduced by 967.5 kB (43%)
2.3 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Eponatech.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 995.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 178.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 178.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Epona Tech images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 692.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 692.9 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 68.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eponatech.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 68.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (64%)
25
9
The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Epona Tech. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
eponatech.com
94 ms
www.eponamind.com
882 ms
7e40e406927338f538ba697c02503f95.css
67 ms
3d56e165c7b5a86bab3ec1c9a6ddd858.css
116 ms
particles.js
71 ms
jquery.min.js
44 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
67 ms
apbct-public-bundle.min.js
118 ms
rbtools.min.js
137 ms
rs6.min.js
228 ms
js
54 ms
js
103 ms
4a20dd734c87569ea16b9f92f563a53e.css
88 ms
script.js
120 ms
a33420ab088be38397e1ee0e722171a9.css
92 ms
scripts.min.js
160 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
109 ms
common.js
113 ms
flags.js
132 ms
eponshoe_mobile.jpg
288 ms
EponaMind-Logo-4C.svg
87 ms
epona-tech-extra-dark.jpg
90 ms
EponaMind_Images_Horse_White_v2L.png
293 ms
metron-homepage.jpg
292 ms
EponaMind_Tablet.png
294 ms
EponaMind_CTA_Icon.svg
153 ms
nKKU-Go6G5tXcr4uPhWpVac.woff
63 ms
nKKU-Go6G5tXcr4uPhWpVaQ.ttf
125 ms
nKKU-Go6G5tXcr4yPRWpVac.woff
120 ms
nKKU-Go6G5tXcr4yPRWpVaQ.ttf
124 ms
nKKU-Go6G5tXcr4WPBWpVac.woff
119 ms
nKKU-Go6G5tXcr4WPBWpVaQ.ttf
125 ms
nKKU-Go6G5tXcr5KPxWpVac.woff
119 ms
nKKU-Go6G5tXcr5KPxWpVaQ.ttf
121 ms
nKKU-Go6G5tXcr5mOBWpVac.woff
120 ms
nKKU-Go6G5tXcr5mOBWpVaQ.ttf
125 ms
nKKZ-Go6G5tXcrabGwY.woff
121 ms
nKKZ-Go6G5tXcrabGwU.ttf
191 ms
nKKU-Go6G5tXcr4-ORWpVac.woff
122 ms
nKKU-Go6G5tXcr4-ORWpVaQ.ttf
192 ms
nKKU-Go6G5tXcr5aOhWpVac.woff
123 ms
nKKU-Go6G5tXcr5aOhWpVaQ.ttf
198 ms
nKKX-Go6G5tXcr72KwyAdg.woff
124 ms
nKKX-Go6G5tXcr72KwyAdQ.ttf
200 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff
125 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
125 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQ.woff
125 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
187 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff
187 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
188 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff
189 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
189 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVQ.woff
189 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf
191 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwmRdo.woff
191 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwmRdr.ttf
191 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3iu4nwmRdo.woff
192 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3iu4nwmRdr.ttf
193 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwmRdo.woff
193 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwmRdr.ttf
193 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qNq7j.woff
191 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qNq7g.ttf
195 ms
modules.woff
53 ms
et-divi-dynamic-tb-289-1275-late.css
37 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwmRdo.woff
136 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwmRdr.ttf
80 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i94_wmRdo.woff
77 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i94_wmRdr.ttf
81 ms
eponatech.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
eponatech.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
eponatech.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eponatech.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eponatech.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eponatech.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Epona Tech. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: