Tools & Wizards About Us
eshard.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 79% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

eshard.com

Security Testing in Software, Systems and IC | eShard

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

286 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

135 ms

eshard.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing EShard content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about eshard.com

Innovative solutions to scale your security testing in Software, Systems and Integrated Circuits.

Visit eshard.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Eshard.com page load time and found that the first response time was 286 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

eshard.com performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

88/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

98/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.2 s

20/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,380 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.075

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.6 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

eshard.com

286 ms

eshard.com

497 ms

68b325cd48e1bda6f336.css

283 ms

597ef3d539d5d76a7668.css

20 ms

polyfills-b69b38e0e606287ba003.js

21 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Eshard.com, 22% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (497 ms) belongs to the original domain Eshard.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 163.9 kB (86%)

Content Size

191.7 kB

After Optimization

27.8 kB

  • HTML

In fact, the total size of Eshard.com main page is 191.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 191.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 163.9 kB

  • Original 191.7 kB
  • After minification 191.5 kB
  • After compression 27.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 163.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (84%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

3

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EShard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

eshard.com

eshard.com

286 ms

eshard.com

eshard.com

497 ms

68b325cd48e1bda6f336.css

68b325cd48e1bda6f336.css

283 ms

597ef3d539d5d76a7668.css

597ef3d539d5d76a7668.css

20 ms

polyfills-b69b38e0e606287ba003.js

polyfills-b69b38e0e606287ba003.js

21 ms

6794.5848c01f89b951831b75.js

6794.5848c01f89b951831b75.js

23 ms

8458.1e22611f96d8e154560c.js

8458.1e22611f96d8e154560c.js

19 ms

4559.142076b4f5b0ed4d60d9.js

4559.142076b4f5b0ed4d60d9.js

32 ms

7492.46cac5cc3ecf8e338010.js

7492.46cac5cc3ecf8e338010.js

32 ms

7898.678eeac4572b91c2e9a4.js

7898.678eeac4572b91c2e9a4.js

40 ms

webpack-ad1455f2ceecf0bb88ea.js

webpack-ad1455f2ceecf0bb88ea.js

36 ms

framework-336caa3f6419768205fe.js

framework-336caa3f6419768205fe.js

44 ms

main-c3f6a6ada16a4ab469a1.js

main-c3f6a6ada16a4ab469a1.js

43 ms

_app-ee1a2ec769bc944bcd11.js

_app-ee1a2ec769bc944bcd11.js

49 ms

542b50fd-4d1f2c49ed82b2ac924a.js

542b50fd-4d1f2c49ed82b2ac924a.js

58 ms

commons-1102f260b20f358eb00e.js

commons-1102f260b20f358eb00e.js

82 ms

6099-03e2278018f76de64a0d.js

6099-03e2278018f76de64a0d.js

57 ms

6833-f64d00428367a5d525ec.js

6833-f64d00428367a5d525ec.js

76 ms

index-096e4897c131a1da3874.js

index-096e4897c131a1da3874.js

73 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

73 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

173 ms

qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6VfTrOg.woff

qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6VfTrOg.woff

21 ms

qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6G_TrOg.woff

qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6G_TrOg.woff

39 ms

qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6_PPrOg.woff

qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6_PPrOg.woff

59 ms

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexZNRwaM.woff

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexZNRwaM.woff

57 ms

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexXRWwaM.woff

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexXRWwaM.woff

56 ms

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexTpWwaM.woff

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexTpWwaM.woff

58 ms

Accessibility Review

eshard.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

eshard.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

eshard.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eshard.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Eshard.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

eshard.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of EShard. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: