Tools & Wizards About Us
esteliq.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

esteliq.com

Esteliq Clinic | Top Aesthetic Clinic in Kuala Lumpur | Botox, Filler, Laser, Minor Surgery | 1 Utama Shopping Centre, Petaling Jaya, Selangor

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

93 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

58 ms

esteliq.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Esteliq content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about esteliq.com

Experience the benefits of medical grade aesthetic treatments with our LCP qualified doctors. Top clinic for Botox treatment in Kuala Lumpur, Fillers, Laser and Minor Surgery. Discover a new level of ...

Visit esteliq.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Esteliq.com page load time and found that the first response time was 93 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

esteliq.com performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

35/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

42/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.1 s

14/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,470 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.063

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.9 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.esteliq.com

93 ms

minified.js

33 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

32 ms

polyfill.min.js

32 ms

thunderbolt-commons.b70ee867.bundle.min.js

99 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Esteliq.com, 42% (20 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 25% (12 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 854.1 kB (63%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

509.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Esteliq.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 835.2 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 195.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 835.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 15.3 kB

  • Original 73.6 kB
  • After minification 58.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Esteliq needs image optimization as it can save up to 15.3 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 259.8 kB
  • After minification 259.8 kB
  • After compression 256.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (29%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Esteliq. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.esteliq.com

www.esteliq.com

93 ms

minified.js

minified.js

33 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

32 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

32 ms

thunderbolt-commons.b70ee867.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.b70ee867.bundle.min.js

99 ms

main.317ed945.bundle.min.js

main.317ed945.bundle.min.js

98 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

100 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

102 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

113 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

129 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

112 ms

%5BOriginal%20size%5D%20ESTELIQ%20logo%20(2).png

%5BOriginal%20size%5D%20ESTELIQ%20logo%20(2).png

221 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

63 ms

43e5d3f2b08340f985528fdd190b20e9.jpg

43e5d3f2b08340f985528fdd190b20e9.jpg

497 ms

35c42a_a2b103e1f6064f51b41e84a85f0d6039~mv2.png

35c42a_a2b103e1f6064f51b41e84a85f0d6039~mv2.png

409 ms

IMG_1977.jpg

IMG_1977.jpg

351 ms

35c42a_3819ae9c880d44ecb1d66fcea6f101e2~mv2.png

35c42a_3819ae9c880d44ecb1d66fcea6f101e2~mv2.png

366 ms

35c42a_1e3ea4c0c2554fd1b3acd9a3d878f4bc~mv2.png

35c42a_1e3ea4c0c2554fd1b3acd9a3d878f4bc~mv2.png

409 ms

35c42a_200d4d7b35a04a21a479c84fc6488c0f~mv2.png

35c42a_200d4d7b35a04a21a479c84fc6488c0f~mv2.png

411 ms

35c42a_6d5ccea26c1948ab92a0d24f86e356f8~mv2.png

35c42a_6d5ccea26c1948ab92a0d24f86e356f8~mv2.png

552 ms

35c42a_2be88b06898f492e8c51f88cfd32bda1~mv2.png

35c42a_2be88b06898f492e8c51f88cfd32bda1~mv2.png

530 ms

35c42a_a93b00bbb1df4169be020438e5670097~mv2.png

35c42a_a93b00bbb1df4169be020438e5670097~mv2.png

834 ms

35c42a_1f4e0e37be854dfd908e8c950efbabf5~mv2.png

35c42a_1f4e0e37be854dfd908e8c950efbabf5~mv2.png

625 ms

35c42a_7b0ba5f76078418a8248518fcec01df6~mv2.png

35c42a_7b0ba5f76078418a8248518fcec01df6~mv2.png

578 ms

35c42a_c506f0ebb89e43e4b9146c05c2719615~mv2.png

35c42a_c506f0ebb89e43e4b9146c05c2719615~mv2.png

710 ms

35c42a_7d619f78012a45d3bfe60f9896024262~mv2.png

35c42a_7d619f78012a45d3bfe60f9896024262~mv2.png

754 ms

35c42a_643a357d8bd54fec93019239bcb50328~mv2.png

35c42a_643a357d8bd54fec93019239bcb50328~mv2.png

720 ms

35c42a_1bc0755aa25841899687667dbda1351c~mv2.png

35c42a_1bc0755aa25841899687667dbda1351c~mv2.png

740 ms

35c42a_99e57103a5d6431893ee5cf71b044511~mv2.jpg

35c42a_99e57103a5d6431893ee5cf71b044511~mv2.jpg

888 ms

35c42a_150e19fb20354830bbce365a9cf71aa1~mv2.jpg

35c42a_150e19fb20354830bbce365a9cf71aa1~mv2.jpg

978 ms

35c42a_2af56a0ec8784b2e94342fc8b894e84f~mv2.jpg

35c42a_2af56a0ec8784b2e94342fc8b894e84f~mv2.jpg

1008 ms

35c42a_68da15f9c80348f4a9801babc83077a2.jpg

35c42a_68da15f9c80348f4a9801babc83077a2.jpg

1022 ms

94 ms

93 ms

87 ms

85 ms

87 ms

85 ms

124 ms

124 ms

124 ms

121 ms

122 ms

123 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

6 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

12 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

8 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

5 ms

Accessibility Review

esteliq.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

esteliq.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

esteliq.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Esteliq.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Esteliq.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

esteliq.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Esteliq. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: